Literature DB >> 16008741

Effect of intraportal infusion to improve small for size graft injury in living donor adult liver transplantation.

Taketoshi Suehiro1, Mitsuo Shimada, Keiji Kishikawa, Tatsuo Shimura, Yuji Soejima, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Kohji Hashimoto, Yasushi Mochida, Shinji Hashimoto, Yoshihiko Maehara, Hiroyuki Kuwano.   

Abstract

The most important problem in the living donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT) is a small for size graft. Although a right lobe graft is used in many cases in order to avoid small for size graft, for a donor, the risk has few in left lobe graft. We evaluate the effect of an intraportal infusion treatment to the small for size graft. One hundred and twelve patients who underwent LDALT were studied. The graft weight recipient standard liver volume ratio (GV/SLV) of these patients were 50% or less. We divided the patients into following two groups; infusion group (n = 53) and control group (n = 59). For the infusion group, 16 G double lumen catheter was inserted into portal vein and nafamostat mesilate (protease inhibitor which stabilize coagulofibrinolytic state; 200 mg/day), prostaglandin E(1) (vasodilator and hepatoprotective effect; 500 microg/day) and thromboxane A(2) synthetase inhibitor (vasodilator and anticoagulant effect; 160 mg/day) were administrated continuously for 7 days. Small-for-size graft syndrome was defined as bilirubin >10 mg/dl and ascites >1000 cc on postoperative day (POD) 14. Comparison examination of a background factors and postoperative bilirubin and amount of ascites was carried out. The mean GV/SLV did not have the difference at 39.1% of infusion group, and 38.3% of control group (P = 0.58). By the control group, 15 patients (25.4%) were small-for-size graft syndrome, however, there was only two (3.8%) small-for-size graft syndrome in infusion group (P = 0.04). The bilirubin levels of infusion and control group on 7 and 14 POD were 9.9 and 7.8 vs. 9.5 and 10.5 mg/dl, respectively. The amount of ascites of infusion group on 7 and 14 POD were 870 and 430 cc, respectively. On the contrary, in control group, the amount of ascites on 7 and 14 POD were 1290 and 1070 cc, respectively. Bilirubin levels and the amount of ascites on 7 and 14 POD were lower in the patients with infusion group then those with control group. There were no differences between infusion group and control group in age, sex and Child's classification. The intraportal infusion had an effect in prevention of hyperbilirubinemia and loss in quality of excessive ascites in the patients with small for size graft. This was suggested to be what is depended on the improvement of the microcirculation insufficiency considered one of the causes of small-for-size graft syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16008741     DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2005.00159.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  14 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of hepatic blood flow: the hepatic arterial buffer response revisited.

Authors:  Christian Eipel; Kerstin Abshagen; Brigitte Vollmar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Portosystemic Shunts for "Too Small-for-Size Syndrome" After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Erdem Kinaci; Cuneyt Kayaalp
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Early Graft Dysfunction in Living Donor Liver Transplantation and the Small for Size Syndrome.

Authors:  Jay A Graham; Benjamin Samstein; Jean C Emond
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2014-03

4.  Hepatic flow optimization in full right split liver transplantation.

Authors:  Stefano Di Domenico; Enzo Andorno; Giovanni Varotti; Umberto Valente
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-07-27

5.  Preliminary experience in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in a single center in China.

Authors:  Lunan Yan; Bo Li; Yong Zeng; Tianfu Wen; Jichun Zhao; Wentao Wang; Jiayin Yang; Mingqing Xu; Yukui Ma; Zheyu Chen; Jiangwen Liu; Hong Wu
Journal:  Front Med China       Date:  2007-02-01

Review 6.  Current concept of small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Toru Ikegami; Mitsuo Shimada; Satoru Imura; Yusuke Arakawa; Akira Nii; Yuji Morine; Hirofumi Kanemura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Portal inflow preservation during portal diversion in small-for-size syndrome.

Authors:  Xian-Qiang Wang; Yue-Fang Xu; Jing-Wang Tan; Wen-Ping Lv; Zhe Liu; Jian-Ping Zeng; Jia-Hong Dong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Impact of mesocaval shunt on safe minimal liver remnant: porcine model.

Authors:  Yu-Liang Tu; Xuan Wang; Da-Dong Wang; Zi-Man Zhu; Jing-Wang Tan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Feasible usage of ABO incompatible grafts in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Toru Ikegami; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Yuji Soejima; Hideaki Uchiyama; Ken Shirabe; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 10.  Modulation of splanchnic circulation: Role in perioperative management of liver transplant patients.

Authors:  Ahmed Mukhtar; Hany Dabbous
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.