Literature DB >> 16007875

Transformation in the use of radiation therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma: new concepts and indications lead to modern field design and are assisted by PET imaging and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

Joachim Yahalom1.   

Abstract

The role of radiation therapy (RT) in Hodgkin lymphoma has changed substantially; it has evolved from a first-line comprehensive single agent into a complementary adjuvant following chemotherapy. Yet, the significant contribution of adding radiotherapy has repeatedly been confirmed by recent information from several prospective randomized trials in early stage patients (CCG, Canada NCIC, and EORTC/GELA H9F). In a recent study that included patients of all stages adding radiotherapy impacted significantly on overall survival. Even in advanced-stage disease, in patients with less than CR, and/or bulky disease or in programs that use short-course chemotherapy (e.g. Stanford V) involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) remained essential. Randomized studies and most recently the GHSG HD 10 and HD 11 documented excellent results with low-dose IFRT of only 20 Gy in both early stage and in intermediate-stage patients. It is now standard of care to use IFRT rather than the extended radiation fields of the past (mantle, inverted Y, and STLI/TLI). Even smaller volumes than IFRT, such as 'lymph-node fields' are advocated by paediatrics groups and are under consideration for future adults treatment programs. This change in RT concept has been motivated by need to reduce normal tissue exposure in order to markedly lessen the risk of late complications. The small fields of current radiotherapy allow more conformal and innovative approaches that have not been technically feasible in the past. They also mandate better targeting. Both the accuracy and the confirmality of 'min-radiation' are augmented, by using new advances in imaging, treatment planning, and new radiation delivery systems. The PET/CT/Simulator integrated hardware with innovative software allows more accurate PET and CT (or MRI) parallel volume contouring, radiation 'dose painting' (dose tailored to PET residual activity) and field 'sculpting'. Introducing intensity modulated radiotherapy technology (IMRT)--a technology that was originally designed for small tumors treated with very high doses--to the field of lymphoma provides safer and more accurate radiotherapy to selected patients with very bulky residual disease and permits re-irradiation of relapsed disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16007875     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2005.00461.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Haematol Suppl        ISSN: 0902-4506


  8 in total

1.  Applications of new irradiation modalities in patients with lymphoma: Promises and uncertainties.

Authors:  Youlia M Kirova; Cyrus Chargari
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-03-28

2.  Effect of organ size and position on out-of-field dose distributions during radiation therapy.

Authors:  Sarah B Scarboro; Marilyn Stovall; Allen White; Susan A Smith; Derek Yaldo; Stephen F Kry; Rebecca M Howell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  The use of FDG-PET to target tumors by radiotherapy.

Authors:  Guido Lammering; Dirk De Ruysscher; Angela van Baardwijk; Brigitta G Baumert; Jacques Borger; Ludy Lutgens; Piet van den Ende; Michel Ollers; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  Tailored strategies for radiation therapy in classical Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Stephanie A Terezakis; Yvette L Kasamon
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  High-dose chemo-radiotherapy for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and the significance of pre-transplant functional imaging.

Authors:  Craig H Moskowitz; Joachim Yahalom; Andrew D Zelenetz; Zhigang Zhang; Daniel Filippa; Julie Teruya-Feldstein; Tarun Kewalramani; Alison J Moskowitz; Robert David Rice; Jocelyn Maragulia; Jill Vanak; Tanya Trippett; Paul Hamlin; Steven Horowitz; Ariela Noy; Owen A O'Connor; Carol Portlock; David Straus; Stephen D Nimer
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 6.998

6.  Transesophageal Echocardiography and Radiation-induced Damages.

Authors:  Marzia Cottini; Vincenzo Polizzi; Paolo Giuseppe Pino; Vitaliano Buffa; Francesco Musumeci
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

7.  Influence of different treatment techniques on radiation dose to the LAD coronary artery.

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Sabine Schill; Peter Kneschaurek; Michael Molls
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 8.  Overview of early response assessment in lymphoma with FDG-PET.

Authors:  Michael P MacManus; John F Seymour; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.909

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.