Literature DB >> 16007682

The ratio of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to prostate volume (PSA density) as a parameter to improve the detection of prostate carcinoma in PSA values in the range of < 4 ng/mL.

Carsten Stephan1, Greta Stroebel, Marc Heinau, Andre Lenz, Andreas Roemer, Michael Lein, Dietmar Schnorr, Stefan A Loening, Klaus Jung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prostate specific antigen (PSA) density (PSAD) (the quotient of PSA and prostate volume) compared with the percent free PSA (%fPSA) in different total PSA (tPSA) ranges from 2 ng/mL to 20 ng/mL. Possible cut-off levels depending on the tPSA should be established.
METHODS: In total, 1809 men with no pretreatment of the prostate were enrolled between 1996 and 2004. Total and free PSA were measured with the IMMULITE PSA and Free PSA kits (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA). Prostate volume was determined by transrectal ultrasound. The diagnostic validity of tPSA, %fPSA, and PSAD was evaluated by receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS: The PSAD differed significantly (P < 0.0001) between patients with prostate carcinoma and patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia in all analyzed ranges of tPSA and prostate volume. At the 90% and 95% sensitivity levels and regarding the area under the ROC curve (AUC) within the tPSA range of 2-4 ng/mL, The PSAD was significantly better than tPSA and %fPSA. Within the tPSA range of 4-10 ng/mL, the PSAD did not perform better than %fPSA.
CONCLUSIONS: PSAD showed a better performance than %fPSA at tPSA concentrations < 4 ng/mL for detecting prostate carcinoma, with a significantly larger AUC for PSAD (0.739) compared with %fPSA (0.667). PSAD did not perform better than %fPSA when the tPSA range of 4-10 ng/mL was analyzed. Different PSAD cut-off values of 0.05 at tPSA 2-4 ng/mL, 0.1 at tPSA 4-10 ng/mL, and 0.19 at 10-20 ng/mL were necessary to reach 95% sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16007682     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  12 in total

1.  New technique for prostate volume assessment.

Authors:  Mohamad Habes; Jeanette Bahr; Thilo Schiller; Jens-Peter Kühn; Laura Hoppe; Martin Burchardt; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Diagnostic value of MRI-based PSA density in predicting transperineal sector-guided prostate biopsy outcomes.

Authors:  Findlay MacAskill; Su-Min Lee; David Eldred-Evans; Wahyu Wulaningsih; Rick Popert; Konrad Wolfe; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Giles Rottenberg; Sidath H Liyanage; Peter Acher
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Additional value of PCA3 density to predict initial prostate biopsy outcome.

Authors:  A Ruffion; P Perrin; M Devonec; D Champetier; M Decaussin; P Paparel; V Vlaeminck-Guillem
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Transition zone prostate specific antigen density improves prostate cancer detection in Iranian men.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Nowroozi; Mohsen Ayati; Hassan Jamshidian; Amir Arbab; Hamidreza Ghorbani; Erfan Amini; Hassan Hakima; Sohrab Salehi; Alireza Ghadian
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2015-03-20

5.  Assay-specific artificial neural networks for five different PSA assays and populations with PSA 2-10 ng/ml in 4,480 men.

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Chuanliang Xu; Henning Cammann; Markus Graefen; Alexander Haese; Hartwig Huland; Axel Semjonow; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Mesut Remzi; Bob Djavan; Mark F Wildhagen; Bert G Blijenberg; Patrik Finne; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Klaus Jung; Hellmuth-Alexander Meyer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  "Finding the needle in a haystack": oncologic evaluation of patients treated for LUTS with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

Authors:  Annika Herlemann; Kerstin Wegner; Alexander Roosen; Alexander Buchner; Philipp Weinhold; Alexander Bachmann; Christian G Stief; Christian Gratzke; Giuseppe Magistro
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  Philip Harvey; Amman Basuita; Deborah Endersby; Ben Curtis; Aphrodite Iacovidou; Mary Walker
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  The role of National Institutes of Health category IV prostatitis in accurately staging the newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Authors:  E Aglamis; C Tasdemir; C Ceylan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Predictive Factors for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy of Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels Equal to or Less Than 4 ng/ml.

Authors:  Hyoung Woo Kim; Young Hwii Ko; Seok Ho Kang; Jeong Gu Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-03-18

10.  Role of prostate volume in the early detection of prostate cancer in a cohort with slowly increasing prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  Young Min Kim; Sungchan Park; June Kim; Seonghun Park; Ji Ho Lee; Dong Soo Ryu; Seong Hoon Choi; Sang Hyeon Cheon
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.