| Literature DB >> 1600718 |
J D Batson1, J S Hoban, M E Bitterman.
Abstract
Honeybees (Apis mellifera) were classically conditioned with odor as conditioned stimulus (CS), sucrose as unconditioned stimulus (US), and proboscis extension as response. The purpose of Experiment 1 (Ns = 26 and 27) was to look for facilitation of forward conditioning by CS-US overlap, but rapid conditioning without overlap left little room for improvement. In 2 further experiments, CS and US were simultaneous, and response to odor alone was measured in subsequent tests. In Experiment 2, a Simultaneous group (N = 25) responded more to the training odor than did an Unpaired control group (N = 25). In Experiment 3, a differentially conditioned Simultaneous group (N = 29) responded more to an odor paired with sucrose in training (S+) than to an odor presented alone (S-). The implications of the results for the problem of the role of amount of reward in honeybee learning are considered.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1992 PMID: 1600718 DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.106.2.114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Comp Psychol ISSN: 0021-9940 Impact factor: 2.231