Literature DB >> 16006797

An immunohistochemical comparison between low-grade and high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas: significantly higher expression of p53, MIB1, BCL2, HER-2/neu, and C-KIT in high-grade neoplasms.

Ciaran J O'Neill1, Michael T Deavers, Anais Malpica, Heather Foster, W Glenn McCluggage.   

Abstract

Ovarian serous carcinoma (OSC) is the most common ovarian epithelial malignancy. Recently, a dualistic pathway of ovarian serous carcinogenesis has been proposed based on morphologic observations and molecular genetic analysis. In this scheme, low-grade OSC arises in a stepwise fashion from a benign serous cystadenoma through a usual serous borderline tumor through a micropapillary variant of serous borderline tumor. In contrast, the more common high-grade OSC arises de novo from the ovarian surface epithelium or the epithelium of cortical inclusion cysts with an as yet unrecognized precursor lesion. Although the division of OSC into low- and high-grade variants is gaining greater acceptance, and although there is accumulating molecular genetic evidence for this, there is little published information regarding a comparison of protein expression between these two types of OSC. In this study, we have investigated the immunohistochemical expression of a wide range of proteins in cases of low-grade (n = 22) and high-grade (n = 47) OSC. Antibodies used were p53, MIB1, BCL2, WT1, HER-2/neu, C-KIT, osteopontin, and survivin. For all antibodies, except MIB1, cases were scored as 0 (negative or occasional positive cells), 1+ (<10% cells positive), 2+ (10%-25% cells positive), 3+ (26%-50% cells positive), 4+ (51%-75% cells positive) or 5+ (>75% cells positive). For MIB1, the percentage of positive nuclei was calculated. There was a statistically significant higher expression of p53, MIB1, BCL2, HER-2/neu, and C-KIT in high-grade compared with low-grade OSC (P < 0.05). Thirty of 47 (64%) cases of high-grade OSC exhibited 5+ staining with p53 compared with 4 of 22 (18%) low-grade neoplasms. Twelve of 47 (26%) high-grade OSCs exhibited 5+ staining with BCL2 compared with 1 of 22 (5%) low-grade OSCs. The mean MIB1 proliferative index in high-grade OSCs was 55.4% compared with 23.0% in low-grade OSCs. Virtually all cases of both low-grade and high-grade OSCs exhibited diffuse nuclear positivity with WT1 and diffuse cytoplasmic positivity with survivin. Osteopontin expression was variable with no significant difference in expression between low-grade and high-grade OSC. Although expression of both HER-2/neu and C-KIT was significantly higher in high-grade compared with low-grade OSC, only rare cases exhibited strong positivity with these antibodies, which could be of therapeutic value in individual cases, although this would require additional molecular investigations. The significant differences in protein expression between low-grade and high-grade OSC provides further support for a different underlying pathogenesis. In particular, the differences in p53 immunoreactivity are in keeping with the observation that p53 gene mutation is more common in high-grade than low-grade OSC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16006797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  40 in total

1.  Hormonal therapy for recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum.

Authors:  David M Gershenson; Charlotte C Sun; Revathy B Iyer; Anais L Malpica; John J Kavanagh; Diane C Bodurka; Kathleen Schmeler; Michael Deavers
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Role of p53 and Rb in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  David C Corney; Andrea Flesken-Nikitin; Jinhyang Choi; Alexander Yu Nikitin
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 3.  Ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen R Cho; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 23.472

Review 4.  Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems.

Authors:  Russell Vang; Ie-Ming Shih; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 5.  The role of the fallopian tube in the origin of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Britt K Erickson; Michael G Conner; Charles N Landen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Wild-type tumor repressor protein 53 (Trp53) promotes ovarian cancer cell survival.

Authors:  Lisa K Mullany; Zhilin Liu; Erin R King; Kwong-Kwok Wong; JoAnne S Richards
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.736

7.  Osteopontin is a marker for cancer aggressiveness and patient survival.

Authors:  G F Weber; G S Lett; N C Haubein
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Cystadenofibroma of the rete ovarii: a case report with review of literature.

Authors:  Manisha Ram; Abdel Abdulla; Khalil Razvi; Ivilina Pandeva; Awatif Al-Nafussi
Journal:  Rare Tumors       Date:  2009-07-22

9.  PAX2 expression in low malignant potential ovarian tumors and low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas.

Authors:  Celestine S Tung; Samuel C Mok; Yvonne T M Tsang; Zhifei Zu; Huijuan Song; Jinsong Liu; Michael T Deavers; Anais Malpica; Judith K Wolf; Karen H Lu; David M Gershenson; Kwong-Kwok Wong
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  MicroRNA profiling of BRCA1/2 mutation-carrying and non-mutation-carrying high-grade serous carcinomas of ovary.

Authors:  Cheng-Han Lee; Subbaya Subramanian; Andrew H Beck; Inigo Espinosa; Janine Senz; Shirley X Zhu; David Huntsman; Matt van de Rijn; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.