Literature DB >> 1600675

Indications for lumbar spine fusion in the adult.

S I Esses1, R J Huler.   

Abstract

More than 20,000 lumbar spine fusions are performed annually in the United States. Results of surgery unfortunately are inconsistent and may reflect unsatisfactory patient selection. Indications for lumbar arthrodesis may arise in degenerative disk disease, deformity, distal extension of previous arthrodesis, trauma, spondylolisthesis, and spinal stenosis (in association with diskectomy or decompression). There are several techniques in the assessment of potential candidates for low lumbar arthrodesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1600675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  13 in total

1.  Expansive lumbar laminoplasty for degenerative spinal stenosis in patients below 70 years of age.

Authors:  H Matsui; M Kanamori; H Ishihara; N Hirano; H Tsuji
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Union versus nonunion after posterolateral lumbar fusion: a comparison of long-term surgical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Takahiro Tsutsumimoto; Mitsuhiko Shimogata; Yasuo Yoshimura; Hiromichi Misawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Trends in hospital use for mechanical neck and back problems in Ontario and the United States: discretionary care in different health care systems.

Authors:  J N Lavis; A Malter; G M Anderson; V M Taylor; R A Deyo; C Bombardier; T Axcell; W Kreuter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-01-13       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Older Age and Leg Pain Are Good Predictors of Pain and Disability Outcomes in 2710 Patients Who Receive Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Chad E Cook; Anthony K Frempong-Boadu; Kristen Radcliff; Isaac Karikari; Robert Isaacs
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-08-05

5.  Lumbar instrumented posterolateral fusion in spondylolisthetic and failed back patients: a long-term follow-up study spanning 11-13 years.

Authors:  Veli Turunen; Timo Nyyssönen; Hannu Miettinen; Olavi Airaksinen; Timo Aalto; Juhana Hakumäki; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Impact of Body Mass Index on Postsurgical Outcomes for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Madhav R Patel; Kevin C Jacob; Frank A Chavez; Justin T DesLaurier; Hanna Pawlowski; Michael C Prabhu; Nisheka N Vanjani; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-06-20

7.  Retrolisthesis and lumbar disc herniation: a postoperative assessment of patient function.

Authors:  Kevin K Kang; Michael S Shen; Wenyan Zhao; Jon D Lurie; Afshin E Razi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.

Authors:  Amar A Patel; Matthew Zfass-Mendez; Nathan H Lebwohl; Michael Y Wang; Barth A Green; Allan D Levi; Steven Vanni; Seth K Williams
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

9.  The Memory Metal Spinal System in a Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) Procedure: A Prospective, Non-Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance.

Authors:  D Kok; M Grevitt; Fh Wapstra; Ag Veldhuizen
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-06-15

10.  Perioperative risk factors related to lumbar spine fusion surgery in korean geriatric patients.

Authors:  Jung-Hyun Lee; Hyoung-Joon Chun; Hyeong-Joong Yi; Koang Hum Bak; Yong Ko; Yoon Kyoung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.