S M Akerkar1, M Kanitkar, L S Bichile. 1. Department of Medicine, Seth G.S. Medical College, and K.E.M. Hospital, Parel, Mumbai-12, India. Shashank77_2000@yahoo.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is abundant literature documenting that the Internet is fast changing the way patients access health-related information, learn about their illnesses, and make healthcare-related decisions. However, there is hardly any data regarding Indian patients accessing health-related information available on the Internet. AIMS: To determine patients' use of the Internet as a medical information resource and to determine their experience, their perceptions of the quality and reliability of the information available. SETTING: The study was carried out in the outpatient clinic of an urban, tertiary care private sector hospital in November 2004. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our survey instrument consisted of an anonymous single-page questionnaire. Eight hundred and eighty consecutive adults aged 18-70 years, attending the general outpatient clinic of a tertiary care private hospital completed the questionnaire. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-one (32%) patients acknowledged surfing the Internet, while 75% (212/281) of them acknowledged that they accessed health-related information. Amongst those who accessed the Internet, 130 (61%) found the information on the net to be of average quality. Almost all patients (211/212) felt that the information served the purpose and 95% (201/212) also found also found it to be reliable. Only 7% (21/281) patients were aware of the presence of any quality standards pertaining to health information sites and none could name any accreditation standard. CONCLUSIONS: One in four patients attending the private set-up is using the Internet for health information. A majority of patients find the information on the net reliable and of good quality. Awareness about health information quality standards is a rarity.
BACKGROUND: There is abundant literature documenting that the Internet is fast changing the way patients access health-related information, learn about their illnesses, and make healthcare-related decisions. However, there is hardly any data regarding Indian patients accessing health-related information available on the Internet. AIMS: To determine patients' use of the Internet as a medical information resource and to determine their experience, their perceptions of the quality and reliability of the information available. SETTING: The study was carried out in the outpatient clinic of an urban, tertiary care private sector hospital in November 2004. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our survey instrument consisted of an anonymous single-page questionnaire. Eight hundred and eighty consecutive adults aged 18-70 years, attending the general outpatient clinic of a tertiary care private hospital completed the questionnaire. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-one (32%) patients acknowledged surfing the Internet, while 75% (212/281) of them acknowledged that they accessed health-related information. Amongst those who accessed the Internet, 130 (61%) found the information on the net to be of average quality. Almost all patients (211/212) felt that the information served the purpose and 95% (201/212) also found also found it to be reliable. Only 7% (21/281) patients were aware of the presence of any quality standards pertaining to health information sites and none could name any accreditation standard. CONCLUSIONS: One in four patients attending the private set-up is using the Internet for health information. A majority of patients find the information on the net reliable and of good quality. Awareness about health information quality standards is a rarity.
Authors: N Srikanth; Rakesh Rana; Richa Singhal; Sophia Jameela; Rajeshwari Singh; Shruti Khanduri; Arunabh Tripathi; Sumeet Goel; Leena Chhatre; Ashwin Chandra; B C S Rao; K S Dhiman Journal: JMIRx Med Date: 2021-05-07
Authors: Amr Jamal; Samina A Khan; Ahmed AlHumud; Abdulaziz Al-Duhyyim; Mohammed Alrashed; Faisal Bin Shabr; Alwalid Alteraif; Abdullah Almuziri; Mowafa Househ; Riaz Qureshi Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 5.428