Literature DB >> 16006501

The statin studies: from targeting hypercholesterolaemia to targeting the high-risk patient.

H T Ong1.   

Abstract

The landmark HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) studies have practical lessons for clinicans. The 4S trial established the importance of treating the hypercholesterolaemic patient with cardiovascular heart disease. Next, WOSCOPS showed the benefit of treating healthy, high-risk hypercholesterolaemic men. CARE, a secondary prevention trial, showed the benefit of treating patients with cholesterol levels within normal limits. This was confirmed by the LIPID trial, another secondary prevention study, which enrolled patients with cholesterol levels 155-271 mg/dl (4-7 mmol/l). The importance of treating patients with established ischaemic heart disease, and those at high risk of developing heart disease, regardless of cholesterol level, was being realized. In the MIRACL trial, hypocholesterolaemic therapy was useful in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome, while the AVERT study showed that aggressive statin therapy is as good as angioplasty in reducing ischaemic events in patients with stable angina. By showing the value of fluvastatin after percutaneous intervention, LIPS confirmed that benefit is a class action of the statins. The HPS randomized over 20 000 patients, and showed beyond doubt the value of statins in reducing cardiovascular events in the high-risk patient. Although PROSPER showed benefit in treating the elderly patients above 70 years, statin therapy in this trial was associated with an increase in cancer incidence. The comparative statin trials, PROVE-IT, REVERSAL, Phase Z of the A to Z, ALLIANCE and TNT, all showed that high-dose statins will better reduce cardiovascular events in the high-risk patient, although the adverse effects of therapy will also be increased. ALLHAT-LLT, ASCOT-LLA and CARDS showed that for statin therapy to demonstrate a significant benefit, hypertensive or diabetic patients must be at sufficiently high risk of cardiovascular events. The emphasis is now on the risk level for developing cardiovascular events, and treatment should target the high-risk group and not the lipid level of the patient. No therapy is free of adverse effect. Treatment of those most at risk will bring the most benefit; treatment of those not at high risk of cardiovascular disease may expose patients who would not benefit much from therapy to its adverse effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16006501     DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hci093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  QJM        ISSN: 1460-2393


  14 in total

1.  Should risky treatments be reserved for secondary prevention? Theoretical considerations regarding risk-benefit tradeoffs.

Authors:  M Brandon Westover; Nathaniel A Eiseman; Matt T Bianchi
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Emerging roles of the intestine in control of cholesterol metabolism.

Authors:  Janine-K Kruit; Albert K Groen; Theo J van Berkel; Folkert Kuipers
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A Man With Dyslipidemia: To Treat Or Not To Treat?

Authors:  Ong Hean Teik; A R Sinnathuray
Journal:  Malays Fam Physician       Date:  2006-04-30

4.  Ezetimibe treatment lowers indicators of oxidative stress in hypercholesterolemic subjects with high oxidative stress.

Authors:  Michael S Kostapanos; Athanasia T Spyrou; Constantinos C Tellis; Irene F Gazi; Alexandros D Tselepis; Moses Elisaf; Evangelos N Liberopoulos
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 1.880

Review 5.  Low-density lipoprotein reduction: is the risk worth the benefit?

Authors:  Anup K Sabharwal; Jeffrey B Boord
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Adherence to preventive statin therapy according to socioeconomic position.

Authors:  Helle Wallach-Kildemoes; Morten Andersen; Finn Diderichsen; Theis Lange
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Sociodemographic and diagnostic characteristics of prescribing a second-line lipid-lowering medication: ezetimibe used as initial medication, switch from statins, or add-on medication.

Authors:  Helle Wallach-Kildemoes; Ebba Holme Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Is the high-risk strategy to prevent cardiovascular disease equitable? A pharmacoepidemiological cohort study.

Authors:  Helle Wallach-Kildemoes; Finn Diderichsen; Allan Krasnik; Theis Lange; Morten Andersen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Evidence-based prescribing of statins: a developing world perspective.

Authors:  H T Ong
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Transcriptional profiling uncovers a network of cholesterol-responsive atherosclerosis target genes.

Authors:  Josefin Skogsberg; Jesper Lundström; Alexander Kovacs; Roland Nilsson; Peri Noori; Shohreh Maleki; Marina Köhler; Anders Hamsten; Jesper Tegnér; Johan Björkegren
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.