Literature DB >> 16005945

Surgical stage, final grade, and survival of women with endometrial carcinoma whose preoperative endometrial biopsy shows well-differentiated tumors.

Gamal H Eltabbakh1, Jamie Shamonki, Sharon L Mount.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess the surgical stage, final grade, and survival of women with endometrial carcinoma whose preoperative endometrial biopsy showed well-differentiated (FIGO grade 1) carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted including all women treated at the University of Vermont between 1992 and 2004 whose preoperative endometrial biopsy was reviewed by the staff at the Pathology Department and diagnosed as FIGO grade 1 adenocarcinoma and who received peritoneal washings, total abdominal (or laparoscopic) hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy as part of their surgery.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-two patients (age: 32-91, median: 60) were enrolled. All patients had total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, peritoneal washings, and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Fifteen (8.2%) patients had para-aortic lymphadenectomy. There were no operative mortalities. Fourteen patients (7.7%) had major operative or postoperative complications. There was disagreement between the pre- and postoperative grade in 30% of the study group. The surgical stages were: IA: 55 (30.2%), IB: 61 (33.5%), IC: 26 (14.3%), IIA: 9 (4.9%), IIB: 8 (4.4%), IIIA: 10 (5.5%), IIIB: 2 (1.1%), IIIC: 8 (4.4%), and IV: 3 (1.6%). Postoperatively, 131 (72%) patients received no additional treatment, 47 (25.8%) received radiation therapy, 3 (1.6%) received chemotherapy, and 1 (0.5%) received Megace. During a median follow-up period of 6 years, 8 (4.4%) patients had recurrence and 6 (3.2%) died from their disease. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival was 95.2% and 96.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 30% of women with endometrial carcinoma whose preoperative endometrial biopsy shows grade 1 tumors have grade 2 or 3 in the hysterectomy specimen and 12.6% have advanced surgical stage (stage III and IV) disease. Women with preoperative endometrial biopsy showing grade 1 tumors who undergo surgical staging have excellent survival and acceptable operative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16005945     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  10 in total

1.  Serum HE4 is correlated to prognostic factors and survival in patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  A Stiekema; Car Lok; C M Korse; W J van Driel; V van der Noort; G G Kenter; K K Van de Vijver
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer: a review.

Authors:  Cyril Touboul; Enrica Bentivegna; Catherine Uzan; Sebastien Gouy; Patricia Pautier; Catherine Lhommé; Pierre Duvillard; Christine Haie-Meder; Philippe Morice
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Comparison of preoperative endometrial biopsy grade and final pathologic diagnosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Behiye Pınar Çilesiz Göksedef; Ozgür Akbayır; Aytül Corbacıoğlu; Hakan Güraslan; Fatmagül Sencan; Onur Erol; Ahmet Cetin
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-06-01

4.  An MRI radiomics nomogram improves the accuracy in identifying eligible candidates for fertility-preserving treatment in endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Bi-Cong Yan; Feng-Hua Ma; Ying Li; Yan-Feng Fan; Zhi-Long Huang; Xiao-Liang Ma; Xue-Ting Wen; Jin-Wei Qiang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Does the use of the 2009 FIGO classification of endometrial cancer impact on indications of the sentinel node biopsy?

Authors:  Marcos Ballester; Martin Koskas; Charles Coutant; Elisabeth Chéreau; Jeremy Seror; Roman Rouzier; Emile Daraï
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  Fertility sparing surgery for stage IA type I and G2 endometrial cancer in reproductive-aged patients: evidence-based approach and future perspectives.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Diego Rossetti; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi; Antonio Simone Laganà
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-02-10

7.  Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review Protocol.

Authors:  Maria-Eulalia Fernandez-Montoli; Jordi Sabadell; Nayanar-Adela Contreras-Perez
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Interobserver agreement for endometrial cancer characteristics evaluated on biopsy material.

Authors:  S Nofech-Mozes; N Ismiil; V Dubé; R S Saad; Z Ghorab; A Grin; I Ackerman; M A Khalifa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2012-02-02

9.  Utility of Preoperative CA125 Assay in the Management Planning of Women Diagnosed with Uterine Cancer.

Authors:  N Povolotskaya; N Das; K Dhar; D Brinkmann; F Gardner; R Woolas
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2014-02-27

10.  Expression of L1CAM in curettage or high L1CAM level in preoperative blood samples predicts lymph node metastases and poor outcome in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Ingvild L Tangen; Reidun K Kopperud; Nicole Cm Visser; Anne C Staff; Solveig Tingulstad; Janusz Marcickiewicz; Frédéric Amant; Line Bjørge; Johanna Ma Pijnenborg; Helga B Salvesen; Henrica Mj Werner; Jone Trovik; Camilla Krakstad
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.