Literature DB >> 16005779

How can trust be investigated? Drawing lessons from past experience.

Jane Goudge1, Lucy Gilson.   

Abstract

Although the concept of trust has gained popularity in public debate and academic analysis over recent years, it continues to be regarded by many as difficult to define and so to investigate. In this paper we provide guidance on how to conduct future work on trust in the health sector, by reviewing the methods used in earlier studies. The paper draws on a range of the available literature which investigates trust in different settings from a variety of disciplinary perspectives. The review suggests that appropriate definitions of trust are highly context dependent. Where little is known about how trust functions, qualitative research to explore how respondents view trust and 'trusted' behaviour is important in advance of quantitative investigation. The results of qualitative inquiry facilitate the development and refinement of hypotheses about how trust functions and can be used to generate questions for use in structured questionnaires. Quantitative inquiry is valuable because it allows larger scale investigation and generates data that can be used, for example, to assess the statistical significance of different determinants to overall levels of trust. The review indicates that trying to use existing data to answer a new research question, without ensuring that respondents' answers refer to the form of trust under investigation, may lead to the generation of use of inappropriate data. In this respect, it highlights the need to test pre-existing research tools to ensure that they remain valid and relevant and retain their reliability in different settings. Although there may appear to be common structural features of specific relationships that might allow international measurement tools to be developed for use in the same type setting across geographical locations, cultural differences might invalidate such tools. Specific investigation of such differences is, therefore, needed to explore the potential validity of international tools for investigating trust.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16005779     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  25 in total

1.  Health-care system distrust in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Yael Schenker; Douglas B White; David A Asch; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.425

2.  Trust on doctor, social capital and medical care use of the elderly.

Authors:  Jae-Young Lim; Hyun-Hoon Lee; Yeon-Hee Hwang
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-12-05

3.  Continuity and trust in primary care: a qualitative study informed by game theory.

Authors:  Carolyn Tarrant; Mary Dixon-Woods; Andrew M Colman; Tim Stokes
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 4.  Trust, choice and power in mental health: a literature review.

Authors:  Richard Laugharne; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Dimensions and Role-Specific Mediators of Surrogate Trust in the ICU.

Authors:  Paul J Hutchison; Katie McLaughlin; Tom Corbridge; Kelly N Michelson; Linda Emanuel; Peter H S Sporn; Megan Crowley-Matoka
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Assessing cancer patients' trust in their oncologist: development and validation of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS).

Authors:  M A Hillen; C C E Koning; J W Wilmink; J H G Klinkenbijl; E H Eddes; B L Kallimanis-King; J C J M de Haes; E M A Smets
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Development and validation of a socioculturally competent trust in physician scale for a developing country setting.

Authors:  Vijayaprasad Gopichandran; Edwin Wouters; Satish Kumar Chetlapalli
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  African migrant patients' trust in Chinese physicians: a social ecological approach to understanding patient-physician trust.

Authors:  Megan M McLaughlin; Louis Simonson; Xia Zou; Li Ling; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Midwives' views on factors that contribute to health care inequalities among immigrants in Sweden: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sharareh Akhavan
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2012-08-18

10.  Dimensions and determinants of trust in health care in resource poor settings--a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  Vijayaprasad Gopichandran; Satish Kumar Chetlapalli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.