Literature DB >> 16005120

Clinical experience with inactivated, virosomal influenza vaccine.

I A de Bruijn1, J Nauta, W C M Cramer, L Gerez, A M Palache.   

Abstract

Current available influenza vaccines are safe and effective in preventing influenza. Nevertheless, there is a need for influenza vaccines with improved efficacy in the elderly. This need is underscored by both the observation that influenza has a major clinical and economic impact in the elderly and the fact that currently available vaccines are generally less effective in elderly than in younger subjects. Several approaches are currently being pursued in order to improve the efficacy of influenza vaccines in elderly individuals and others who have impaired immune responses to conventional influenza vaccines. A novel antigen-presenting strategy to overcome impaired immune responses is the use of virosomes. Previously, data on safety and reactogenicity have been published regarding the use of virosomal influenza vaccines. Data from three recent clinical trials are presented here. The first of these was a comparative study of a virosomal vaccine and a conventional subunit vaccine in "at-risk" adults with underlying chronic illness. The virosomal vaccine demonstrated comparable tolerability to the subunit vaccine, with about 98% of patients reporting tolerability to be good or very good. The vast majority of adverse events reported were mild to moderate in severity. With both vaccine types, mean HI titres decreased with age for both the A-H1N1 and B influenza virus strains, but for the A-H3N2 strain (the most virulent of the three strains), mean HI titres did not decrease with age, suggesting a better response with the virosomal vaccine when compared to the subunit vaccine. All three studies explored the long-term persistence of antibodies after vaccination with virosomal influenza vaccines. Immunogenicity declined over time but remained high at 4, 6 and 12 months post-vaccination compared to baseline, indicating that adequate seroprotection is achievable for the duration of the influenza season. Virosomal vaccines may induce better immunity in elderly subjects and may be more effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in this age group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16005120     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  8 in total

Review 1.  Inactivated influenza vaccines: recent progress and implications for the elderly.

Authors:  Valentina Parodi; Daniela de Florentiis; Mariano Martini; Filippo Ansaldi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Influenza virosomes supplemented with GPI-0100 adjuvant: a potent vaccine formulation for antigen dose sparing.

Authors:  Heng Liu; Jacqueline de Vries-Idema; Wouter Ter Veer; Jan Wilschut; Anke Huckriede
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Hemagglutination inhibiting antibody persistence 1 year after influenza vaccination in Korean children and adolescents.

Authors:  Eun Kyeong Kang; Byung Wook Eun; Nam Hee Kim; Yun Kyung Kim; Jung Sub Lim; Dong Ho Kim
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Developments in Vaccine Adjuvants.

Authors:  Farrhana Ziana Firdaus; Mariusz Skwarczynski; Istvan Toth
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 5.  Development of stable influenza vaccine powder formulations: challenges and possibilities.

Authors:  J-P Amorij; A Huckriede; J Wilschut; H W Frijlink; W L J Hinrichs
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Vaccines for an influenza pandemic: scientific and political challenges.

Authors:  Lars R Haaheim
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 7.  Improving seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Melanie Saville; Grenville Marsh; Agnes Hoffenbach
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 8.  Nanotechnology in vaccine delivery.

Authors:  Laura J Peek; C Russell Middaugh; Cory Berkland
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 15.470

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.