Literature DB >> 16004167

Hospitalists and improved cost savings in patients with bacterial pneumonia at a state level.

Danielle B Scheurer1, Justin G Miller, Dwight I Blair, Pam J Pride, Gena M Walker, Patrick J Cawley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In the hospitalist literature, most studies have focused on outcomes related to cost savings for individual hospital systems. This study sought to determine if hospitalists could improve cost savings at a state level.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a statewide database for inpatients in 2002 with bacterial pneumonia. The primary outcomes measured were mean length of stay (LOS) and mean charges per patient between hospitalists and nonhospitalists. The secondary outcome measured was percentage of patients by severity of illness between the groups.
RESULTS: The difference of LOS in the moderate illness category was 4.9 days for hospitalists and 5.2 for nonhospitalists (P = 0.04). The major illness category was 7.4 and 8 (P = 0.03), and the extreme illness category was 10.6 and 12.9 (P = 0.02). The difference of mean charges per patient in the major category were dollars 20,950 and dollars 23,259 (P = 0.03) and dollars 42,045 and dollars 56,867, respectively (P = 0.002), in the extreme category. Patients in the major/extreme categories of illness accounted for 41% of hospitalist patients versus 32% of nonhospitalist patients (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalists have shorter LOS, lower charges per patient, and admit a larger proportion of high acuity patients at a state level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16004167     DOI: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000157532.78673.2F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  4 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of outcomes and quality measures in adult patients cared for by hospitalists vs nonhospitalists.

Authors:  Michael C Peterson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Comparing patient outcomes of academician-preceptors, hospitalist-preceptors, and hospitalists on internal medicine services in an academic medical center.

Authors:  David L Chin; Michelle H Wilson; Heejung Bang; Patrick S Romano
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Do hospitalist physicians improve the quality of inpatient care delivery? A systematic review of process, efficiency and outcome measures.

Authors:  Heather L White; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  A controlled investigation of optimal internal medicine ward team structure at a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Brad Spellberg; Roger J Lewis; Darryl Sue; Bahman Chavoshan; Janine Vintch; Mark Munekata; Caroline Kim; Charles Lanks; Mallory D Witt; William Stringer; Darrell Harrington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.