Literature DB >> 16003630

Medical rapid prototyping technologies: state of the art and current limitations for application in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

John Winder1, Richard Bibb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe state-of-the-art software and hardware requirements for the manufacture of high quality medical models manufactured using medical rapid prototyping. The limitations of medical models, the source of artefacts, and their physical appearance are illustrated along with remedies for their removal.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical models were built using predominantly stereolithography and fused deposition modeling at both institutions over a period of 6 years. A combined total of 350 models have been produced for a range of maxillofacial, neurosurgical, and orthopedic applications. Stereolithography, fused deposition modeling, computerized numerical milling, and other technologies are described along with computer software requirements.
RESULTS: A range of unwanted artefacts that create distortions on medical models have been identified. These include data import, computed tomography gantry distortion, metal, motion, surface roughness due to support structure removal or surface modeling, and image data thresholding. The source of the artefact has been related to the patient, imaging modality performance, or the modeling technology. Discussion as to the significance of the artefacts on clinical use is provided.
CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that models of human anatomy generated by medical rapid prototyping are subject to rigorous quality assurance at all stages of the manufacturing process. Clinicians should be aware of potential areas for inaccuracies within models and review the source images in cases where model integrity is in doubt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16003630     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  50 in total

1.  Experience with the use of prebent plates for the reconstruction of mandibular defects.

Authors:  Martin I Salgueiro; Mark R Stevens
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2010-12

Review 2.  Stereolithographic bone scaffold design parameters: osteogenic differentiation and signal expression.

Authors:  Kyobum Kim; Andrew Yeatts; David Dean; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  A critical inventory of preoperative skull replicas.

Authors:  J H D Fasel; J Beinemann; K Schaller; P Gailloud
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Three-Dimensional Printing: Custom-Made Implants for Craniomaxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery.

Authors:  Mariana Matias; Horácio Zenha; Horácio Costa
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-01-03

Review 5.  Selective laser sintering in biomedical engineering.

Authors:  Alida Mazzoli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Application of two segmentation protocols during the processing of virtual images in rapid prototyping: ex vivo study with human dry mandibles.

Authors:  Eduardo Gomes Ferraz; Lucio Costa Safira Andrade; Aline Rode dos Santos; Vinicius Rabelo Torregrossa; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen; Viviane Almeida Sarmento
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Samuel Clark Ligon; Robert Liska; Jürgen Stampfl; Matthias Gurr; Rolf Mülhaupt
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Rotational alignment in patient-specific instrumentation in TKA: MRI or CT?

Authors:  Alcindo Silva; Elisabete Pinto; Ricardo Sampaio
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martijn G M Schotanus; Elke Thijs; Marion Heijmans; Rein Vos; Nanne P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Stereolithographic biomodeling of equine ovary based on 3D serial digitizing device.

Authors:  Junpei Kimura; Nobunori Kakusho; Kenji Yamazawa; Yuuko Hirano; Yasuo Nambo; Hideo Yokota; Ryutaro Himeno
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.