Literature DB >> 16002932

Comparison of levofloxacin and cefotaxime combined with ofloxacin for ICU patients with community-acquired pneumonia who do not require vasopressors.

Olivier Leroy1, Pierre Saux, Jean-Pierre Bédos, Evelyne Caulin.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levofloxacin (L) as monotherapy in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in comparison with therapy using a combination of cefotaxime (C) plus ofloxacin (O).
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized 1:1, comparative, open, parallel-group study.
SETTING: Multinational study with 149 sites. PATIENTS: A total of 398 randomized patients who had been admitted to the ICU with severe CAP without shock, including 308 patients in a modified intent-to-treat population and 271 patients in the per-protocol (PP) population (L group, 139 patients; C + O group, 132 patients).
INTERVENTIONS: Therapy with levofloxacin (500 mg IV, q12h) vs therapy with a C + O combination (C, 1g IV, q8h; O, 200 mg IV, q12h) for 10 to 14 days. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: The main end point was the clinical efficacy at the end of treatment (ie, the test-of-cure [TOC] visit). The statistical hypothesis was the noninferiority of L therapy to C + O therapy with a 2.5% alpha risk (unilateral) and a 15% maximum set difference. At the TOC visit, a clinical success was observed in 79.1% of patients (L group) and 79.5% of patients (C + O group) in the PP population (difference, -0.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.79 to 9.97% without adjustment for simplified acute physiology score [SAPS] II at inclusion; difference, -0.3%; 95% CI, -10.13 to 9.58% with adjustment for SAPS II). A satisfactory bacteriologic response was present in 73.7% of L group patients and 77.5% of C + O group patients, including responses of 75.7% and 70.3%, respectively, in the L group and C + O group in the Streptococcus pneumoniae-documented population. In the safety analysis, 20 patients in the L group (10.3%) and 16 patients in the C + O group (8.0%) experienced at least one adverse event that was considered to be treatment-related.
CONCLUSION: L therapy was at least as effective as the combination therapy of C + O in the treatment of a subset of patients with CAP requiring ICU admission. This conclusion cannot be extrapolated to patients requiring mechanical ventilation or vasopressors (ie, those patients in shock).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16002932     DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.1.172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  23 in total

1.  What Is New in Antibiotic Therapy in Community-Acquired Pneumonia? An Evidence-Based Approach Focusing on Combined Therapy.

Authors:  Simone Gattarello
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.

Authors:  Lionel A Mandell; Richard G Wunderink; Antonio Anzueto; John G Bartlett; G Douglas Campbell; Nathan C Dean; Scott F Dowell; Thomas M File; Daniel M Musher; Michael S Niederman; Antonio Torres; Cynthia G Whitney
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Assessment of bias in outcomes reported in trials on pneumonia: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Avni; S Shiber-Ofer; L Leibovici; M Paul
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia: optimal treatment strategies.

Authors:  Ulrich Thiem; Hans-Jürgen Heppner; Ludger Pientka
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Defining severe pneumonia.

Authors:  Samuel M Brown; Nathan C Dean
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.878

6.  Abstracts of the 16th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Nice, France. April 1-4, 2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.067

7.  Community-acquired pneumonia: impact of empirical antibiotic therapy without respiratory fluoroquinolones nor third-generation cephalosporins.

Authors:  J Pradelli; K Risso; F G de Salvador; E Cua; R Ruimy; P-M Roger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 8.  Defining and predicting severe community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Samuel M Brown; Nathan C Dean
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.915

9.  Severe pneumococcal pneumonia: impact of new quinolones on prognosis.

Authors:  David Olive; Hugues Georges; Patrick Devos; Nicolas Boussekey; Arnaud Chiche; Agnes Meybeck; Serge Alfandari; Olivier Leroy
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 10.  Improving outcomes of elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Félix Gutiérrez; Mar Masiá
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.