Literature DB >> 16002504

Low-profile stent placement with the monorail technique for treatment of renal artery stenosis: midterm results of a prospective trial.

Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck1, Christian Frahm, Charlotte Behm, Phillip Jobst Schäfer, Hendrik Bolte, Martin Heller, Thomas Jahnke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine feasibility, safety, and midterm patency of a monorail balloon stent device for the treatment of renal artery stenosis (RAS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a period of 30 months, 47 patients (with severe hypertension, n=45; renal insufficiency, n=20) with 50 cases of RAS and indications for stent implantation (calcified ostial lesion, n=41; insufficient percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, n=6; dissection, n=3) were enrolled into the prospective evaluation. After predilation, 59 stents (Rx-Herculink 4 mm, n=2; 5 mm, n=19; 6 mm, n=35; 7 mm, n=3) were implanted under manometer control with use of the long-sheath technique (5 F; 6 F for 7-mm stents) via a femoral (n=44) or transbrachial approach (n=6). Parameters of hypertension and renal insufficiency were determined before and after the procedure and for a maximum of 18 months. Restenosis rate was determined with color duplex ultrasonography.
RESULTS: Renal artery stent placement (mean diameter, 5.7 mm; mean length, 16 mm) was technically successful in all cases (100%). Mean blood pressure and serum creatinine level decreased from 177/93 mm Hg to 145/78 mm Hg and from 1.8 mg/dL to 1.5 mg/dL, respectively. Within 48 hours after the implantation, acute occlusions occurred in two patients, supposedly triggered by cholesterol embolization. Primary and primary assisted patency rates were 87% and 92% at 6 months and 75% and 84% at 18 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Renal artery stent placement with the rapid-exchange monorail system is a safe procedure with promising patency rates. In combination with the long-sheath technique, adequate control of stent deployment is guaranteed during the entire intervention. The low profile of the device facilitates the use of small sheaths (5 F) to minimize access-site complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16002504     DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000163013.46098.D4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  1 in total

1.  Renal artery revascularization after unsuccessful percutaneous therapy: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Kai M Balzer; S Neuschäfer; T A Sagban; D Grotemeyer; T Pfeiffer; L C Rump; W Sandmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.445

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.