Literature DB >> 16002485

The effect of estradiol and progesterone on knee and ankle joint laxity.

Bruce D Beynnon1, Ira M Bernstein, Adelle Belisle, Bjarne Brattbakk, Patrick Devanny, Randall Risinger, Denise Durant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Female athletes suffer a higher incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injuries compared to their male counterparts, and they appear to be at increased risk for these injuries when they have increased anterior-posterior knee laxity and at specific phases of the menstrual cycle. Although the mechanism by which these factors combine to increase injury risk is unclear, studies suggest that cyclic variations in joint laxity produced by hormone fluctuation during the menstrual cycle predispose an athlete to increased risk of ligamentous injury. Little is known about whether joint laxity varies cyclically during the menstrual cycle and if so, whether it is modulated by cyclic variations of estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4). HYPOTHESIS: Increased serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) levels are associated with increased ankle and knee joint laxity. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study. Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: Ankle laxity, anterior-posterior knee laxity, and serum concentrations of estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) were measured during the menstrual cycle in women and at corresponding time intervals in men (controls). Ankle laxity was measured from stress radiographs and included anterior talar translation relative to the tibia and talar tilt relative to the tibia; anterior-posterior knee laxity was measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer.
RESULTS: Women had greater knee and ankle laxity values compared to men. There was, however, no change in knee and ankle laxity over the normal menstrual cycle in women and no change over time in men. There was no relationship between estradiol and progesterone fluctuation and ankle and knee joint laxity.
CONCLUSIONS: Knee and ankle joint laxities are greater for women compared to men; however, the cyclic estradiol and progesterone fluctuations that occur during the menstrual cycle do not produce cyclic fluctuations of joint laxity. Studies using joint laxity to identify a subject at risk for ligamentous injury need only consider making measurements at a specific point in time, such as during a preseason screening evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16002485     DOI: 10.1177/0363546505275149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  33 in total

1.  ACL Research Retreat V: an update on ACL injury risk and prevention, March 25-27, 2010, Greensboro, NC.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Ajit M Chaudhari; Darin A Padua; Scott G McLean; Susan M Sigward
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  ACL Research Retreat VII: An Update on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Factor Identification, Screening, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Effects of menstrual-cycle hormone fluctuations on musculotendinous stiffness and knee joint laxity.

Authors:  E Eiling; A L Bryant; W Petersen; A Murphy; E Hohmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  The effects of the menstrual cycle on anterior knee laxity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bohdanna T Zazulak; Mark Paterno; Gregory D Myer; William A Romani; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  A comparison of cyclic variations in anterior knee laxity, genu recurvatum, and general joint laxity across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Beverly J Levine; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Hyunsoo Kim; Melissa M Montgomery; David H Perrin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Does peri-operative pregnancy alter the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A report of four cases.

Authors:  P Johal; J H Bayer; D K Martin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Anatomical and structural factors.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Joint stability characteristics of the ankle complex in female athletes with histories of lateral ankle sprain, part II: clinical experience using arthrometric measurement.

Authors:  John E Kovaleski; Robert J Heitman; Larry R Gurchiek; J M Hollis; Wei Liu; Albert W Pearsall
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Jump-landing biomechanics and knee-laxity change across the menstrual cycle in women with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  David R Bell; J Troy Blackburn; Anthony C Hackney; Stephen W Marshall; Anthony I Beutler; Darin A Padua
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  The interrelationships among sex hormone concentrations, motoneuron excitability, and anterior tibial displacement in women and men.

Authors:  Mark Hoffman; Rod A Harter; Bradley T Hayes; Edward M Wojtys; Paul Murtaugh
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.