Literature DB >> 16002005

Induction chemotherapy for head and neck cancer: will history repeat itself?

Athanassios Argiris1.   

Abstract

Locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer remains a therapeutic challenge for multidisciplinary teams. Despite high objective response rates, induction chemotherapy has not resulted in tangible benefit in multiple randomized trials. In recent years, as most evidence solidified the role of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation as either primary or postoperative therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer, induction chemotherapy fell out of scope and practice. The failure of older randomized trials to show a survival benefit from induction chemotherapy can be attributed to several factors. It is possible that the predominance of locoregional failure did not allow any added benefit from better systemic control to translate into a survival advantage. Alternatively, seemingly active chemotherapy regimens may have been suboptimal. Nevertheless, recent developments have altered our perception of head and neck cancer and its treatment. Locoregional control has dramatically improved with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Of note is that none of the previously conducted randomized trials of induction chemotherapy used concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the control arm. Moreover, we witnessed the development of better combination regimens that improved efficacy in the induction setting. The previously standard cisplatin/5-fluoruracil (5-FU) combination is being replaced by the triple combination of taxane/ cisplatin/5-FU. Randomized trials showed that increased activity with the triplet regimen resulted in improved long-term disease control and survival. Finally, cetuximab, an active epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, is entering clinical practice and is expected to change the standard of therapy. With the emergence of more efficacious systemic therapies, the role of induction therapy warrants reevaluation. A number of randomized trials are planned or currently ongoing to investigate concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without induction. These trials are anticipated to redefine the role of induction chemotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16002005     DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2005.0020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  9 in total

Review 1.  Head and neck cancer: an evolving treatment paradigm.

Authors:  David M Cognetti; Randal S Weber; Stephen Y Lai
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The identification of induction chemo-sensitivity genes of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and their clinical utilization.

Authors:  Lianhe Li; Ru Wang; Shizhi He; Xixi Shen; Fanyong Kong; Shuchun Li; Huanhu Zhao; Meng Lian; Jugao Fang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The Expression of Checkpoint and DNA Repair Genes in Head and Neck Cancer as Possible Predictive Factors.

Authors:  Orsolya Rusz; Margit Pál; Éva Szilágyi; László Rovó; Zoltán Varga; Bernadett Tomisa; Gabriella Fábián; Levente Kovács; Olga Nagy; Petra Mózes; Zita Reisz; László Tiszlavicz; Péter Deák; Zsuzsanna Kahán
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in patients with cervical lymph node metastases from unknown primary carcinoma.

Authors:  Young Mi Seol; Young Jin Choi; Byung Joo Lee; Soo Geun Wang
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-09-17

5.  Potential biomarkers for paclitaxel sensitivity in hypopharynx cancer cell.

Authors:  Cheng-Zhi Xu; Run-Jie Shi; Dong Chen; Yi-Yuan Sun; Qing-Wei Wu; Tao Wang; Pei-Hua Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-11-15

Review 6.  Head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Athanassios Argiris; Michalis V Karamouzis; David Raben; Robert L Ferris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Induction chemotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lijuan Zhang; Nan Jiang; Yuexian Shi; Shipeng Li; Peiguo Wang; Yue Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  High RAB25 expression is associated with good clinical outcome in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Marta Téllez-Gabriel; Irene Arroyo-Solera; Xavier León; Alberto Gallardo; Montserrat López; Maria V Céspedes; Isolda Casanova; Antonio López-Pousa; Miquel Quer; Maria A Mangues; Agustí Barnadas; Ramón Mangues; Miguel A Pavón
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 9.  Progresses and Perspectives of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibody Therapy in Head and Neck Cancers.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Tingjun Liu; Yang Qu; Hangbo Liu; Song Guo Zheng; Bin Cheng; Jianbo Sun
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.