Literature DB >> 16001920

Early assessment of dental arch development in repaired unilateral cleft lip and unilateral cleft lip and palate versus controls.

Ann Garrahy1, Declan T Millett, Ashraf F Ayoub.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dental arch relationships and dimensions, relative to an age matched noncleft sample, in Caucasian 3-year-old children with repaired unilateral cleft lip (UCL) or unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP).
DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional, case-control study performed in Scotland, U.K. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven children with repaired unilateral cleft lip, 16 children with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate, and 78 children as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dental arch relationships and linear arch dimensions.
RESULTS: Prevalence of Class III incisor relationship was 31.3% in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate compared with 9.1% in children with unilateral cleft lip. A buccal crossbite was present in 36% of children with unilateral cleft lip, compared with 75.6% of children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.Mean linear maxillary arch dimensions did not differ significantly between children with unilateral cleft lip and the controls. Except for second intermolar width, statistically significant differences existed in mean linear maxillary arch dimensions between the unilateral cleft lip and the unilateral cleft lip and palate groups; the mean linear maxillary arch dimensions were significantly greater in the control group than in the unilateral cleft lip and palate group. The mean cleft-affected anterior quadrant length appeared to be the arch dimension with the greatest power of discrimination among the three groups. There were no significant differences in mean linear mandibular arch dimensions among the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Anterior crossbite was almost three times more common in the unilateral cleft lip and palate group than in the unilateral cleft lip group. Mean linear maxillary arch dimensions differed significantly between the unilateral cleft lip and palate group and the control group. There were no significant differences in mean linear maxillary arch dimensions between unilateral cleft lip and controls or between mean linear mandibular arch dimensions for unilateral cleft lip, unilateral cleft lip and palate, and controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16001920     DOI: 10.1597/03-159.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  5 in total

1.  Maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate : Evaluation of soft and hard tissues using the Alt-RAMEC protocol.

Authors:  Ege Dogan; Ozlem Seckin
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Three dimensional changes of maxillary arch in Unilateral cleft lip and palate patients following comprehensive orthodontic treatment on digital study models.

Authors:  Sanjeev Verma; Sombir Singh; Raj K Verma; Satinder P Singh; Vinay Kumar; Shagun Sharma; Parveen Kalra
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

3.  Occlusal disorders among patients with total clefts of lip, alveolar bone, and palate.

Authors:  Anna Paradowska-Stolarz; Beata Kawala
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Effect of Relaxing Incisions on the Maxillary Growth after Primary Unilateral Cleft Palate Repair in Mild and Moderate Cases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Percy Rossell-Perry; Omar Cotrina-Rabanal; Olga Figallo-Hudtwalcker; Alicia Gonzalez-Vereau
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-01-16

5.  Facial profile and maxillary arch dimensions in unilateral cleft lip and palate children in the mixed dentition stage.

Authors:  Vellore Kannan Gopinath; Ab Rani Samsudin; Siti Noor Fazliah Mohd Noor; Hady Youssef Mohamed Sharab
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.