Literature DB >> 16001850

Multiresidue method for determination of algal toxins in shellfish: single-laboratory validation and interlaboratory study.

Paul McNabb1, Andrew I Selwood, Patrick T Holland, J Aasen, T Aune, G Eaglesham, P Hess, M Igarishi, M Quilliam, D Slattery, J Van de Riet, H Van Egmond, H Van den Top, T Yasumoto.   

Abstract

A method that uses liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) has been developed for the highly sensitive and specific determination of amnesic shellfish poisoning toxins, diarrhetic shellfish poisoning toxins, and other lipophilic algal toxins and metabolites in shellfish. The method was subjected to a full single-laboratory validation and a limited interlaboratory study. Tissue homogenates are blended with methanol-water (9 + 1), and the centrifuged extract is cleaned up with a hexane wash. LC/MS/MS (triple quadrupole) is used for quantitative analysis with reversed-phase gradient elution (acidic buffer), electrospray ionization (positive and negative ion switching), and multiple-reaction monitoring. Ester forms of dinophysis toxins are detected as the parent toxins after hydrolysis of the methanolic extract. The method is quantitative for 6 key toxins when reference standards are available: azaspiracid-1 (AZA1), domoic acid (DA), gymnodimine (GYM), okadaic acid (OA), pectenotoxin-2 (PTX2), and yessotoxin (YTX). Relative response factors are used to estimate the concentrations of other toxins: azaspiracid-2 and -3 (AZA2 and AZA3), dinophysis toxin-1 and -2 (DTX1 and DTX2), other pectenotoxins (PTX1, PTX6, and PTX11), pectenotoxin secoacid metabolites (PTX2-SA and PTX11-SA) and their 7-epimers, spirolides, and homoYTX and YTX metabolites (45-OHYTX and carboxyYTX). Validation data have been gathered for Greenshell mussel, Pacific oyster, cockle, and scallop roe via fortification and natural contamination. For the 6 key toxins at fortification levels of 0.05-0.20 mg/kg, recoveries were 71-99% and single laboratory reproducibilities, relative standard deviations (RSDs), were 10-24%. Limits of detection were <0.02 mg/kg. Extractability data were also obtained for several toxins by using successive extractions of naturally contaminated mussel samples. A preliminary interlaboratory study was conducted with a set of toxin standards and 4 mussel extracts. The data sets from 8 laboratories for the 6 key toxins plus DTX1 and DTX2 gave within-laboratories repeatability (RSD(R)) of 8-12%, except for PTX-2. Between-laboratories reproducibility (RSDR) values were compared with the Horwitz criterion and ranged from good to adequate for 7 key toxins (HorRat values of 0.8-2.0).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16001850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AOAC Int        ISSN: 1060-3271            Impact factor:   1.913


  29 in total

Review 1.  Shifts and stasis in marine HAB monitoring in New Zealand.

Authors:  Lesley Rhodes; Kirsty Smith; Catherine Moisan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Synthesis and biology of cyclic imine toxins, an emerging class of potent, globally distributed marine toxins.

Authors:  Craig E Stivala; Evelyne Benoit; Rómulo Aráoz; Denis Servent; Alexei Novikov; Jordi Molgó; Armen Zakarian
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 13.423

3.  Differential Mobility Spectrometry for Improved Selectivity in Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Paralytic Shellfish Toxins.

Authors:  Daniel G Beach
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Occurrence of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) toxins in clams (Ruditapes decussatus) from Tunis north lagoon.

Authors:  Zina Armi; Souad Turki; Elbahri Trabelsi; Alfiero Ceredi; Elena Riccardi; Anna Milandri
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  In-house validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of lipophilic marine toxins in shellfish using matrix-matched calibration.

Authors:  Arjen Gerssen; Erik H W van Olst; Patrick P J Mulder; Jacob de Boer
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 6.  Current Trends and New Challenges in Marine Phycotoxins.

Authors:  Maria Carmen Louzao; Natalia Vilariño; Carmen Vale; Celia Costas; Alejandro Cao; Sandra Raposo-Garcia; Mercedes R Vieytes; Luis M Botana
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 7.  Marine toxins: chemistry, toxicity, occurrence and detection, with special reference to the Dutch situation.

Authors:  Arjen Gerssen; Irene E Pol-Hofstad; Marnix Poelman; Patrick P J Mulder; Hester J van den Top; Jacob de Boer
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  Use of biosensors as alternatives to current regulatory methods for marine biotoxins.

Authors:  Natalia Vilariño; Eva S Fonfría; M Carmen Louzao; Luis M Botana
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  Potential Threats Posed by New or Emerging Marine Biotoxins in UK Waters and Examination of Detection Methodologies Used for Their Control: Cyclic Imines.

Authors:  Keith Davidson; Clothilde Baker; Cowan Higgins; Wendy Higman; Sarah Swan; Andrea Veszelovszki; Andrew D Turner
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.118

10.  Diarrhetic shellfish toxins and other lipophilic toxins of human health concern in Washington State.

Authors:  Vera L Trainer; Leslie Moore; Brian D Bill; Nicolaus G Adams; Neil Harrington; Jerry Borchert; Denis A M da Silva; Bich-Thuy L Eberhart
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.