PURPOSE: The aims of this study on hepatic arterial Doppler sonography were to ascertain interobserver and interequipment variability, to investigate any potential artificial influence of the ultrasonic contrast agent on the Doppler measurements and to compare the results in healthy and cirrhotic subjects. METHODS:Doppler sonography of the left hepatic artery was performed in nine healthy and nine cirrhotic subjects by three independent observers using three different devices. Continuous infusion of the ultrasonic contrast agent SHU 508A and placebo were administered in a double blind fashion. Systolic, mean and end diastolic peak velocities as well as resistive and pulsatility indices were measured. RESULTS: Equipment associated variances (5.8 - 12.7 %) of the five Doppler parameters were greater than interobserver variances (0.3 - 3.6 %). No significant differences were observed between the velocities using ultrasonic contrast agent and placebo. Systolic (65.9 +/- 3.6 vs. 47.7 +/- 4.2 cm/s mean +/- SE, p = 0.02) and mean peak velocity (35.4 +/- 1.6 vs. 24.5 +/- 1.8 cm/s, p = 0.007) were significantly higher in cirrhotic than in healthy subjects whereas the resistive and pulsatility indices were not different. CONCLUSIONS:Doppler sonography of the left hepatic artery performed by various observers is reproducible as long as the same device is used. Under clinical conditions, velocities are correctly measured with the use of ultrasonic contrast agent and are elevated in patients with cirrhosis.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The aims of this study on hepatic arterial Doppler sonography were to ascertain interobserver and interequipment variability, to investigate any potential artificial influence of the ultrasonic contrast agent on the Doppler measurements and to compare the results in healthy and cirrhotic subjects. METHODS: Doppler sonography of the left hepatic artery was performed in nine healthy and nine cirrhotic subjects by three independent observers using three different devices. Continuous infusion of the ultrasonic contrast agent SHU 508A and placebo were administered in a double blind fashion. Systolic, mean and end diastolic peak velocities as well as resistive and pulsatility indices were measured. RESULTS: Equipment associated variances (5.8 - 12.7 %) of the five Doppler parameters were greater than interobserver variances (0.3 - 3.6 %). No significant differences were observed between the velocities using ultrasonic contrast agent and placebo. Systolic (65.9 +/- 3.6 vs. 47.7 +/- 4.2 cm/s mean +/- SE, p = 0.02) and mean peak velocity (35.4 +/- 1.6 vs. 24.5 +/- 1.8 cm/s, p = 0.007) were significantly higher in cirrhotic than in healthy subjects whereas the resistive and pulsatility indices were not different. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler sonography of the left hepatic artery performed by various observers is reproducible as long as the same device is used. Under clinical conditions, velocities are correctly measured with the use of ultrasonic contrast agent and are elevated in patients with cirrhosis.
Authors: Manil D Chouhan; Rajeshwar P Mookerjee; Alan Bainbridge; Simon Walker-Samuel; Nathan Davies; Steve Halligan; Mark F Lythgoe; Stuart A Taylor Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Young Seo Cho; Kyoung Won Kim; Hye Young Jang; Bo Hyun Kim; Jeongjin Lee; Gi Won Song; Sung Gyu Lee; Dagvasumberel Munkhbaatar Journal: Clin Mol Hepatol Date: 2017-07-04