Charles H Large1, Elizabeth L Webster, Donald C Goff. 1. Department of Neuropharmacology, Psychiatry CEDD, GlaxoSmithKline SpA, Via Fleming 4, 37135, Verona, Italy. Charles.H.Large@gsk.com
Abstract
RATIONALE: Atypical antipsychotic drugs are the drugs of choice for the treatment of schizophrenia. However, despite advances, no treatments have been established for patients who fail to improve with the most effective of these, clozapine. The inhibition of dopamine transmission through blockade of dopamine D2 receptors is considered to be essential for antipsychotic efficacy, but it is postulated that modulation of glutamate transmission may be equally important. In support of this, symptoms similar to schizophrenia can be induced in healthy volunteers using N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist drugs that are also known to enhance glutamate transmission. Furthermore, lamotrigine, which can modulate glutamate release, may add to or synergise with atypical antipsychotic drugs, some of which may themselves modulate glutamate transmission. OBJECTIVES: We examine the evidence for the efficacy of lamotrigine. We consider how this fits with a glutamate neuron dysregulation hypothesis of the disorder. We discuss mechanisms by which lamotrigine might influence neuronal activity and glutamate transmission, and possible ways in which the drug might interact with antipsychotic medications. RESULTS: Data from four clinical studies support the efficacy of adjunctive lamotrigine in the treatment of schizophrenia. In addition, and consistent with a glutamate neuron dysregulation hypothesis of schizophrenia, lamotrigine can prevent the psychotic symptoms or behavioural disruption induced by NMDA receptor antagonists in healthy volunteers or rodents. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of lamotrigine is most likely explained within the framework of a glutamate neuron dysregulation hypothesis, and may arise primarily through the drugs ability to influence glutamate transmission and neural activity in the cortex. The drug is likely to act through inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels, though other molecular interactions cannot be ruled out. Lamotrigine may add to or synergise with some atypical antipsychotic drugs acting on glutamate transmission; alternatively, they may act independently on glutamate and dopamine systems to bring about a combined therapeutic effect. We propose new strategies for the treatment of schizophrenia using a combination of anti-dopaminergic and anti-glutamatergic drugs.
RATIONALE: Atypical antipsychotic drugs are the drugs of choice for the treatment of schizophrenia. However, despite advances, no treatments have been established for patients who fail to improve with the most effective of these, clozapine. The inhibition of dopamine transmission through blockade of dopamine D2 receptors is considered to be essential for antipsychotic efficacy, but it is postulated that modulation of glutamate transmission may be equally important. In support of this, symptoms similar to schizophrenia can be induced in healthy volunteers using N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist drugs that are also known to enhance glutamate transmission. Furthermore, lamotrigine, which can modulate glutamate release, may add to or synergise with atypical antipsychotic drugs, some of which may themselves modulate glutamate transmission. OBJECTIVES: We examine the evidence for the efficacy of lamotrigine. We consider how this fits with a glutamate neuron dysregulation hypothesis of the disorder. We discuss mechanisms by which lamotrigine might influence neuronal activity and glutamate transmission, and possible ways in which the drug might interact with antipsychotic medications. RESULTS: Data from four clinical studies support the efficacy of adjunctive lamotrigine in the treatment of schizophrenia. In addition, and consistent with a glutamate neuron dysregulation hypothesis of schizophrenia, lamotrigine can prevent the psychotic symptoms or behavioural disruption induced by NMDA receptor antagonists in healthy volunteers or rodents. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of lamotrigine is most likely explained within the framework of a glutamate neuron dysregulation hypothesis, and may arise primarily through the drugs ability to influence glutamate transmission and neural activity in the cortex. The drug is likely to act through inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels, though other molecular interactions cannot be ruled out. Lamotrigine may add to or synergise with some atypical antipsychotic drugs acting on glutamate transmission; alternatively, they may act independently on glutamate and dopamine systems to bring about a combined therapeutic effect. We propose new strategies for the treatment of schizophrenia using a combination of anti-dopaminergic and anti-glutamatergic drugs.
Authors: M L Carlsson; P Martin; M Nilsson; S M Sorensen; A Carlsson; S Waters; N Waters Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 1999 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: H P Volz; C Gaser; F Häger; R Rzanny; H J Mentzel; I Kreitschmann-Andermahr; W A Kaiser; H Sauer Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 1997-10-31 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Sergey Shcherbinin; Orla Doyle; Fernando O Zelaya; Sara de Simoni; Mitul A Mehta; Adam J Schwarz Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Eric Plitman; Shinichiro Nakajima; Camilo de la Fuente-Sandoval; Philip Gerretsen; M Mallar Chakravarty; Jane Kobylianskii; Jun Ku Chung; Fernando Caravaggio; Yusuke Iwata; Gary Remington; Ariel Graff-Guerrero Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: John H Krystal; Sanjay J Mathew; D Cyril D'Souza; Amir Garakani; Handan Gunduz-Bruce; Dennis S Charney Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Inna Gaisler-Salomon; Gretchen M Miller; Nao Chuhma; Sooyeon Lee; Hong Zhang; Farhad Ghoddoussi; Nicole Lewandowski; Stephen Fairhurst; Yvonne Wang; Agnès Conjard-Duplany; Justine Masson; Peter Balsam; René Hen; Ottavio Arancio; Matthew P Galloway; Holly M Moore; Scott A Small; Stephen Rayport Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2009-06-10 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: W Cao; H P Shah; A V Glushakov; A P Mecca; P Shi; C Sumners; C N Seubert; A E Martynyuk Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: John D Murray; Alan Anticevic; Mark Gancsos; Megan Ichinose; Philip R Corlett; John H Krystal; Xiao-Jing Wang Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: R Joules; O M Doyle; A J Schwarz; O G O'Daly; M Brammer; S C Williams; M A Mehta Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 4.530