Mario Medvedec1. 1. Clinical Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. mmedvede@kbc-zagreb.hr
Abstract
AIM: To review published in-vivo and in-vitro quantitative dosimetric studies on thyroid stunning in order to derive novel data applicable in clinical practice. METHODS: A non-linear regression analysis was applied to describe the extent of thyroid stunning in thyroid remnants, as a function of the radiation absorbed dose of diagnostic radioiodine-131 (I), in thyroid cancer patients investigated in four in-vivo studies. The regression curves were fitted using individual patient absorbed doses or the mean absorbed doses for the groups of patients. Fitted curves were compared with two recent models, the first found in patients with benign thyroid disease and the second found in cultured thyroid cells after I irradiation. RESULTS: The extrapolated absorbed doses for the onset of thyroid stunning were 0 Gy delivered to thyroid cells in vitro, and < or =4 Gy and 34 Gy delivered to thyroid cells in vivo (malignant and benign conditions, respectively). Thyroid stunning amounted to roughly 50% in the case of 2 Gy delivered to thyroid cells in vitro, and in the case of < or =30 Gy and 472 Gy delivered to thyroid cells in vivo (malignant and benign conditions, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There is no scintigraphically sufficient diagnostic amount of I that can be given prior to I therapy for thyroid cancer that does not cause thyroid stunning, i.e. it is not recommended to deliver pre-therapeutically more than a few gray (<5 Gy) into thyroid remnants. More investigations are required to confirm the proposed in-vitro and benign in-vivo models, but characteristic absorbed doses presented so far for in-vitro vs. in-vivo malignant vs. in-vivo benign thyroid environments differ roughly by an order of magnitude.
AIM: To review published in-vivo and in-vitro quantitative dosimetric studies on thyroid stunning in order to derive novel data applicable in clinical practice. METHODS: A non-linear regression analysis was applied to describe the extent of thyroid stunning in thyroid remnants, as a function of the radiation absorbed dose of diagnostic radioiodine-131 (I), in thyroid cancerpatients investigated in four in-vivo studies. The regression curves were fitted using individual patient absorbed doses or the mean absorbed doses for the groups of patients. Fitted curves were compared with two recent models, the first found in patients with benign thyroid disease and the second found in cultured thyroid cells after I irradiation. RESULTS: The extrapolated absorbed doses for the onset of thyroid stunning were 0 Gy delivered to thyroid cells in vitro, and < or =4 Gy and 34 Gy delivered to thyroid cells in vivo (malignant and benign conditions, respectively). Thyroid stunning amounted to roughly 50% in the case of 2 Gy delivered to thyroid cells in vitro, and in the case of < or =30 Gy and 472 Gy delivered to thyroid cells in vivo (malignant and benign conditions, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There is no scintigraphically sufficient diagnostic amount of I that can be given prior to I therapy for thyroid cancer that does not cause thyroid stunning, i.e. it is not recommended to deliver pre-therapeutically more than a few gray (<5 Gy) into thyroid remnants. More investigations are required to confirm the proposed in-vitro and benign in-vivo models, but characteristic absorbed doses presented so far for in-vitro vs. in-vivo malignant vs. in-vivo benign thyroid environments differ roughly by an order of magnitude.
Authors: Scott A Rivkees; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Frederik A Verburg; Christoph Reiners; Markus Luster; Christopher K Breuer; Catherine A Dinauer; Robert Udelsman Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Frederik A Verburg; Michael Lassmann; Uwe Mäder; Markus Luster; Christoph Reiners; Heribert Hänscheid Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: M Luster; S E Clarke; M Dietlein; M Lassmann; P Lind; W J G Oyen; J Tennvall; E Bombardieri Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: C Happel; W T Kranert; D Gröner; B Bockisch; A Sabet; I Vardarli; R Görges; K Herrmann; F Grünwald Journal: Endocrine Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Christian Happel; Wolfgang Tilman Kranert; Hanns Ackermann; Ina Binse; Benjamin Bockisch; Daniel Gröner; Ken Herrmann; Frank Grünwald Journal: Endocrine Date: 2018-12-31 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Frederik A Verburg; Heribert Hänscheid; Johannes Biko; Maria C Hategan; Michael Lassmann; Michael C Kreissl; Christoph Reiners; Markus Luster Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Zbigniew Adamczewski; Mariusz Stasiołek; Bolesław Karwowski; Marek Dedecjus; Daria Orszulak-Michalak; Anna Merecz; Przemysław W Śliwka; Bartosz Puła; Andrzej Lewiński Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Massimiliano Pacilio; Miriam Conte; Viviana Frantellizzi; Maria Silvia De Feo; Antonio Rosario Pisani; Andrea Marongiu; Susanna Nuvoli; Giuseppe Rubini; Angela Spanu; Giuseppe De Vincentis Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-07-21