Literature DB >> 15999216

Continence pads: have we got it right?

Dhiraj Uchil1, Ranee Thakar, Abdul H Sultan, Joy Seymour, Ray Addison.   

Abstract

Women listed in the Croydon Community Continence database were contacted with a self-assessment questionnaire regarding continence pad usage and quality of life. Completed questionnaires were received from 763 of 1509 (51%) participants. Pads were used for bladder dysfunction (88.1%) and bowel dysfunction (44%). The majority (82.5%) had concurrent medical disorders and problems with mobility with 77.5% being on one or more types of medication. Nearly 39% of women claimed that they would be happy to continue pad use indefinitely and only 28% expressed interest in seeking further help. Compared to bowel dysfunction, bladder dysfunction appeared to have a greater impact on women's quality of life (P < 0.001). Containment products make a substantial contribution in improving the quality of lives of women with bowel and bladder dysfunction. The financial burden of containment products has a major impact on the health budget and therefore, comprehensive clinical evaluation should be mandatory before relegating women to pads as a final resort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15999216     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-005-1341-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  11 in total

1.  An epidemiological study to establish the prevalence of urinary symptoms and felt need in the community: the Leicestershire MRC Incontinence Study. Leicestershire MRC Incontinence Study Team.

Authors:  S Perry; C Shaw; P Assassa; H Dallosso; K Williams; K R Brittain; F Mensah; N Smith; M Clarke; C Jagger; C Mayne; C M Castleden; J Jones; C McGrother
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2000-09

Review 2.  The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Medically recognized urinary incontinence and risks of hospitalization, nursing home admission and mortality.

Authors:  D H Thom; M N Haan; S K Van Den Eeden
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 10.668

4.  Sexual dysfunction is common in women with lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary incontinence: results of a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Andrea Salonia; Giuseppe Zanni; Rossella E Nappi; Alberto Briganti; Federico Dehò; Fabio Fabbri; Renzo Colombo; Giorgio Guazzoni; Valerio Di Girolamo; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Falls risk factors in an acute-care setting: a retrospective study.

Authors:  B Stevenson; E M Mills; L Welin; K G Beal
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  1998

Review 6.  Psychological and cognitive variables affecting treatment outcomes for urinary and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Steve Heymen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  Urinary Incontinence in Women.

Authors:  J Jay; D Staskin
Journal:  Adv Nurse Pract       Date:  1998-10

8.  The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries.

Authors:  S Hunskaar; G Lose; D Sykes; S Voss
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Quality of life and urinary incontinence pad use in women.

Authors:  A C Kinn; A Zaar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

10.  The cost of clinically significant urinary storage symptoms for community dwelling adults in the UK.

Authors:  D A Turner; C Shaw; C W McGrother; H M Dallosso; N J Cooper
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.