Literature DB >> 15999117

Partners of mutation-carriers for Huntington's disease: forgotten persons?

Marleen Decruyenaere1, Gerry Evers-Kiebooms, Andrea Boogaerts, Koen Demyttenaere, René Dom, Jean-Pierre Fryns.   

Abstract

This study focuses on psychological distress and coping strategies in partners of tested persons 5 years after predictive testing for Huntington's disease. A total of 16 carrier-couples and 17 noncarrier-couples participated in the study. Self-report questionnaires were used, assessing depression level, anxiety, intrusive and avoidance thoughts and coping strategies. Partners of carriers have as much distress as carriers, and for some distress variables even more (P<0.05-0.001). They clearly experience more psychological distress than noncarriers' partners, as expected (P<0.05-0.001). Regarding coping strategies, carriers' partners adopt more passive strategies (passive-regressive and avoiding reactions; P<0.05) and less active strategies (social support seeking and problem solving; P<0.05-0.001), compared to carriers. For both carriers and partners, the adoption of more passive strategies for coping was associated with more distress and the use of more active strategies with less distress (for carriers: P<0.05-0.001; for carriers' partners: P<0.05). The presence of children before predictive testing was an additional result-specific distress factor in carriers and their partners. In conclusion, carriers' partners have at least as much psychological distress as carriers, but partners have the tendency to draw back. The results suggest that the grief of carriers' partners may be 'disenfranchised', or not socially recognised, as if they have no right to mourn. We moreover interpreted the results referring to concepts such as anticipatory grief, psychological defences, dissonance processes and imbalanced partner relationship. Finally, we formulated some implications for genetic counselling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15999117     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  5 in total

1.  A new scale to measure family members' perception of community health care services for persons with Huntington disease.

Authors:  Valmi D Sousa; Janet K Williams; Jack J Barnette; David A Reed
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Longitudinal interviews of couples diagnosed with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing fragile X premutation testing.

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Logan B Karns; Karen Ventura; Myra L Clark; Richard H Steeves; Nancy Callanan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Development of the Huntington disease family concerns and strategies survey from focus group data.

Authors:  Janet K Williams; J Jackson Barnette; David Reed; Valmi D Sousa; Debra L Schutte; Meghan McGonigal-Kenney; Lori Jarmon; Emily Phillips; Toni Tripp-Reimer; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  J Nurs Meas       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Together from the start: A transdiagnostic framework for early dyadic interventions for neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Sarah M Bannon; Victoria A Grunberg; Heena R Manglani; Ethan G Lester; Christine Ritchie; Ana-Maria Vranceanu
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 7.538

5.  Exploring the Reliability and Validity of the Huntington's Disease Quality of Life Battery for Carers (HDQoL-C) within A Polish Population.

Authors:  Agnieszka Bartoszek; Aimee Aubeeluck; Edward Stupple; Adrian Bartoszek; Katarzyna Kocka; Barbara Ślusarska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.