OBJECTIVE: Isolated lung perfusion is an experimental technique for the treatment of lung metastases. Single-agent isolated lung perfusion does not result in complete remission. We studied the in vivo and in vitro efficacy of combinations of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and melphalan. METHODS: In vitro, using the sulforhodamine B assay, CC531s cells were incubated with cisplatin, gemcitabine, or melphalan or with a combination of these drugs. One drug was added at concentrations causing 25% growth inhibition, whereas the second drug was added at variable concentrations. In vivo, left pulmonary metastases were induced in Wag/Rij rats by means of intravenous injection of CC531s adenocarcinoma cells. At day 7, rats underwent left isolated lung perfusion with gemcitabine (n = 7), cisplatin (n = 9), melphalan (n = 7), gemcitabine-cisplatin (n = 6), melphalan-gemcitabine (n = 6), and cisplatin-melphalan (n = 7). Death by means of metastatic disease was the end point. Survival and differences in survival were assessed by using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank testing. RESULTS: In vitro synergistic activity was observed for melphalan-gemcitabine, whereas other combinations showed additive or antagonistic activity. In vivo treated rats lived longer compared with control animals ( P < .0001). In isolated lung perfusion melphalan resulted in longer survival compared with gemcitabine ( P = .0016) and cisplatin ( P = .046). Isolated lung perfusion with melphalan-gemcitabine resulted in 67% survival of the rats after 90 days versus 0% in other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated lung perfusion monotherapy or combination therapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, or melphalan resulted in significantly longer survival compared with that seen in control animals. Isolated lung perfusion combination therapy with melphalan-gemcitabine resulted in the best survival either in vitro or in vivo.
OBJECTIVE: Isolated lung perfusion is an experimental technique for the treatment of lung metastases. Single-agent isolated lung perfusion does not result in complete remission. We studied the in vivo and in vitro efficacy of combinations of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and melphalan. METHODS: In vitro, using the sulforhodamine B assay, CC531s cells were incubated with cisplatin, gemcitabine, or melphalan or with a combination of these drugs. One drug was added at concentrations causing 25% growth inhibition, whereas the second drug was added at variable concentrations. In vivo, left pulmonary metastases were induced in Wag/Rij rats by means of intravenous injection of CC531s adenocarcinoma cells. At day 7, rats underwent left isolated lung perfusion with gemcitabine (n = 7), cisplatin (n = 9), melphalan (n = 7), gemcitabine-cisplatin (n = 6), melphalan-gemcitabine (n = 6), and cisplatin-melphalan (n = 7). Death by means of metastatic disease was the end point. Survival and differences in survival were assessed by using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank testing. RESULTS: In vitro synergistic activity was observed for melphalan-gemcitabine, whereas other combinations showed additive or antagonistic activity. In vivo treated rats lived longer compared with control animals ( P < .0001). In isolated lung perfusion melphalan resulted in longer survival compared with gemcitabine ( P = .0016) and cisplatin ( P = .046). Isolated lung perfusion with melphalan-gemcitabine resulted in 67% survival of the rats after 90 days versus 0% in other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated lung perfusion monotherapy or combination therapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, or melphalan resulted in significantly longer survival compared with that seen in control animals. Isolated lung perfusion combination therapy with melphalan-gemcitabine resulted in the best survival either in vitro or in vivo.
Authors: Bart P Van Putte; Jozef Kesecioglu; Jeroen M H Hendriks; Veerle P Persy; Erik van Marck; Paul E Y Van Schil; Marc E De Broe Journal: Crit Care Date: 2004-11-10 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Nuray Gül; Simran Grewal; Marijn Bögels; Gerben J van der Bij; Malika M A Koppes; Steven J Oosterling; Donna M Fluitsma; Kees A Hoeben; Robert H J Beelen; Marjolein van Egmond Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2012-12-01 Impact factor: 8.110