BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that the hereditary hemochromatosis genotypes C282Y/C282Y, C282Y/H63D, or C282Y/wild-type are risk factors for ischemic heart disease (IHD) and myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a prospective study of 9178 individuals from the Danish general population followed up for 24 years, during which 1035 and 511 developed IHD and MI, respectively, and a case-control study of 2441 and 1113 IHD and MI cases versus 8080 controls. C282Y/C282Y, C282Y/H63D, and C282Y/wild-type versus wild-type/wild-type individuals were not associated with increased risk of IHD or MI in prospective studies, overall or stratified by gender. We had 90% power to detect a hazard ratio for IHD of 3.4 for C282Y/C282Y, 1.9 for C282Y/H63D, and 1.3 for C282Y/wild-type versus wild-type/wild-type. Furthermore, these genotypes were not associated with increased risk of IHD or MI in case-control studies, overall or stratified by gender. We had 90% power to detect an odds ratio for IHD of 3.6 for C282Y/C282Y, 1.8 for C282Y/H63D, and 1.3 for C282Y/wild-type versus wild-type/wild-type. CONCLUSIONS: In these studies, hereditary hemochromatosis C282Y/C282Y, C282Y/H63D, and C282Y/wild-type genotypes were not associated with IHD or MI; however, the study lacked the power to exclude the possibility that C282Y/C282Y and C282Y/H63D individuals have a modestly increased risk of IHD or MI.
BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that the hereditary hemochromatosis genotypes C282Y/C282Y, C282Y/H63D, or C282Y/wild-type are risk factors for ischemic heart disease (IHD) and myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a prospective study of 9178 individuals from the Danish general population followed up for 24 years, during which 1035 and 511 developed IHD and MI, respectively, and a case-control study of 2441 and 1113 IHD and MI cases versus 8080 controls. C282Y/C282Y, C282Y/H63D, and C282Y/wild-type versus wild-type/wild-type individuals were not associated with increased risk of IHD or MI in prospective studies, overall or stratified by gender. We had 90% power to detect a hazard ratio for IHD of 3.4 for C282Y/C282Y, 1.9 for C282Y/H63D, and 1.3 for C282Y/wild-type versus wild-type/wild-type. Furthermore, these genotypes were not associated with increased risk of IHD or MI in case-control studies, overall or stratified by gender. We had 90% power to detect an odds ratio for IHD of 3.6 for C282Y/C282Y, 1.8 for C282Y/H63D, and 1.3 for C282Y/wild-type versus wild-type/wild-type. CONCLUSIONS: In these studies, hereditary hemochromatosisC282Y/C282Y, C282Y/H63D, and C282Y/wild-type genotypes were not associated with IHD or MI; however, the study lacked the power to exclude the possibility that C282Y/C282Y and C282Y/H63D individuals have a modestly increased risk of IHD or MI.
Authors: Liang Guo; Atsushi Sakamoto; Anne Cornelissen; Charles C Hong; Aloke V Finn Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Florian Wunderer; Lisa Traeger; Haakon H Sigurslid; Patrick Meybohm; Donald B Bloch; Rajeev Malhotra Journal: Pharmacol Res Date: 2020-01-25 Impact factor: 7.658
Authors: James S Pankow; Eric Boerwinkle; Paul C Adams; Eliseo Guallar; Catherine Leiendecker-Foster; Jason Rogowski; John H Eckfeldt Journal: Transl Res Date: 2008-06-13 Impact factor: 7.012
Authors: Christina Ellervik; Thomas Mandrup-Poulsen; Henrik Ullits Andersen; Anne Tybjærg-Hansen; Merete Frandsen; Henrik Birgens; Børge G Nordestgaard Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Nisreen A Alwan; Debbie A Lawlor; Harry J McArdle; Darren C Greenwood; Janet E Cade Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 4.790