MOTIVATION: Systems biology requires accurate models of protein complexes, including physical interactions that assemble and regulate these molecular machines. Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) and affinity-purification/mass-spectrometry (AP-MS) technologies measure different protein-protein relationships, and issues of completeness, sensitivity and specificity fuel debate over which is best for high-throughput 'interactome' data collection. Static graphs currently used to model Y2H and AP-MS data neglect dynamic and spatial aspects of macromolecular complexes and pleiotropic protein function. RESULTS: We apply the local modeling methodology proposed by Scholtens and Gentleman (2004) to two publicly available datasets and demonstrate its uses, interpretation and limitations. Specifically, we use this technology to address four major issues pertaining to protein-protein networks. (1) We motivate the need to move from static global interactome graphs to local protein complex models. (2) We formally show that accurate local interactome models require both Y2H and AP-MS data, even in idealized situations. (3) We briefly discuss experimental design issues and how bait selection affects interpretability of results. (4) We point to the implications of local modeling for systems biology including functional annotation, new complex prediction, pathway interactivity and coordination with gene-expression data. AVAILABILITY: The local modeling algorithm and all protein complex estimates reported here can be found in the R package apComplex, available at http://www.bioconductor.org CONTACT: dscholtens@northwestern.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://daisy.prevmed.northwestern.edu/~denise/pubs/LocalModeling
MOTIVATION: Systems biology requires accurate models of protein complexes, including physical interactions that assemble and regulate these molecular machines. Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) and affinity-purification/mass-spectrometry (AP-MS) technologies measure different protein-protein relationships, and issues of completeness, sensitivity and specificity fuel debate over which is best for high-throughput 'interactome' data collection. Static graphs currently used to model Y2H and AP-MS data neglect dynamic and spatial aspects of macromolecular complexes and pleiotropic protein function. RESULTS: We apply the local modeling methodology proposed by Scholtens and Gentleman (2004) to two publicly available datasets and demonstrate its uses, interpretation and limitations. Specifically, we use this technology to address four major issues pertaining to protein-protein networks. (1) We motivate the need to move from static global interactome graphs to local protein complex models. (2) We formally show that accurate local interactome models require both Y2H and AP-MS data, even in idealized situations. (3) We briefly discuss experimental design issues and how bait selection affects interpretability of results. (4) We point to the implications of local modeling for systems biology including functional annotation, new complex prediction, pathway interactivity and coordination with gene-expression data. AVAILABILITY: The local modeling algorithm and all protein complex estimates reported here can be found in the R package apComplex, available at http://www.bioconductor.org CONTACT: dscholtens@northwestern.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://daisy.prevmed.northwestern.edu/~denise/pubs/LocalModeling
Authors: Nicholas T Woods; Rafael D Mesquita; Michael Sweet; Marcelo A Carvalho; Xueli Li; Yun Liu; Huey Nguyen; C Eric Thomas; Edwin S Iversen; Sylvia Marsillac; Rachel Karchin; John Koomen; Alvaro N A Monteiro Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Jay R Hesselberth; John P Miller; Anna Golob; Jason E Stajich; Gregory A Michaud; Stanley Fields Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2006-04-10 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Liyun Sang; Julie J Miller; Kevin C Corbit; Rachel H Giles; Matthew J Brauer; Edgar A Otto; Lisa M Baye; Xiaohui Wen; Suzie J Scales; Mandy Kwong; Erik G Huntzicker; Mindan K Sfakianos; Wendy Sandoval; J Fernando Bazan; Priya Kulkarni; Francesc R Garcia-Gonzalo; Allen D Seol; John F O'Toole; Susanne Held; Heiko M Reutter; William S Lane; Muhammad Arshad Rafiq; Abdul Noor; Muhammad Ansar; Akella Radha Rama Devi; Val C Sheffield; Diane C Slusarski; John B Vincent; Daniel A Doherty; Friedhelm Hildebrandt; Jeremy F Reiter; Peter K Jackson Journal: Cell Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Haiyuan Yu; Pascal Braun; Muhammed A Yildirim; Irma Lemmens; Kavitha Venkatesan; Julie Sahalie; Tomoko Hirozane-Kishikawa; Fana Gebreab; Na Li; Nicolas Simonis; Tong Hao; Jean-François Rual; Amélie Dricot; Alexei Vazquez; Ryan R Murray; Christophe Simon; Leah Tardivo; Stanley Tam; Nenad Svrzikapa; Changyu Fan; Anne-Sophie de Smet; Adriana Motyl; Michael E Hudson; Juyong Park; Xiaofeng Xin; Michael E Cusick; Troy Moore; Charlie Boone; Michael Snyder; Frederick P Roth; Albert-László Barabási; Jan Tavernier; David E Hill; Marc Vidal Journal: Science Date: 2008-08-21 Impact factor: 47.728