Literature DB >> 15998547

Decubitus direct current treatment (DDCT) of pressure ulcers: results of a randomized double-blinded placebo controlled study.

Abraham Adunsky1, Avi Ohry.   

Abstract

Electrostimulation for the treatment of pressure sores remains problematic and controversial. We studied the decubitus direct current treatment (DDCT) electrostimulation treatment of pressure sores stage 3 degree, with respect to rates of ulcer closure and wound area reduction. This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study involving 11 departments of geriatric and rehabilitation medicine including 63 patients. We compared a placebo treated group (PG) with an active treatment group (TG). Treatment lasted for 8 consecutive weeks, followed by a 12-week-period of follow-up. At day 57 (end of treatment) and at day 147 (end of follow-up), there was no difference between the groups with regards to rates of complete closure of ulcers (p=0.28 and 0.39, respectively), as well as for the mean time needed to achieve complete wound closure (p=0.16). Absolute ulcer area reduction and speed rate of wound area reduction (reflected by change from baseline ulcer area, percentage) were better in participants allocated in the treatment group only until day 45 (standardized estimate for trend of healing speed -0.44 and -0.14 for TG and PG, respectively). Afterwards, there were no differences between the two groups. A logistic regression analysis favored complete healing in TG, compared with PG (odds ratio 1.6, CI 0.4-4.73). Analysis of per protocol patients revealed that time needed for wound closure was 52% longer in PG (p=0.03, compared with TG). The results suggest that DDCT treatment for pressure ulcers grade 3 degree, in addition to the conservative wound care, may be useful in accelerating the healing process during the first period of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15998547     DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2005.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr        ISSN: 0167-4943            Impact factor:   3.250


  17 in total

1.  Pressure ulcers: treatment.

Authors:  Madhuri Reddy
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-12-11

Review 2.  Pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Nicky Cullum; Emily Petherick
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-03-19

Review 3.  Pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Madhuri Reddy
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-04-28

Review 4.  Clinical Trials Involving Biphasic Pulsed Current, MicroCurrent, and/or Low-Intensity Direct Current.

Authors:  Pamela E Houghton
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Novel Technologies in Chronic Wound Care.

Authors:  Yehiel Hayun; Dafna Shilo Yaacobi; Tal Shachar; Moti Harats; Andrew E Grush; Asaf Olshinka
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.195

6.  Management of chronic pressure ulcers: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-07-01

Review 7.  Biomedical applications of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Siwei Zhao; Abijeet Singh Mehta; Min Zhao
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of wrap therapy for wound healing acceleration in patients with NPUAP stage II and III pressure ulcer.

Authors:  Seiji Bito; Akihiro Mizuhara; Sandai Oonishi; Kensuke Takeuchi; Masatsune Suzuki; Kazuhiro Akiyama; Kazuyo Kobayashi; Kayoko Matsunaga
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Electrical Stimulation for Pressure Injuries: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-11-08

10.  Electrical stimulation for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Mohit Arora; Lisa A Harvey; Joanne V Glinsky; Lianne Nier; Lucija Lavrencic; Annette Kifley; Ian D Cameron
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.