Literature DB >> 15996534

Binding of MutS mismatch repair protein to DNA containing UV photoproducts, "mismatched" opposite Watson--Crick and novel nucleotides, in different DNA sequence contexts.

Peter D Hoffman1, Huixian Wang, Christopher W Lawrence, Shigenori Iwai, Fumio Hanaoka, John B Hays.   

Abstract

Mismatch-repair (MMR) systems suppress mutation via correction of DNA replication errors (base-mispairs) and responses to mutagenic DNA lesions. Selective binding of mismatched or damaged DNA by MutS-homolog proteins-bacterial MutS, eukaryotic MSH2.MSH6 (MutSalpha) and MSH2.MSH3-initiates mismatch-correction pathways and responses to lesions, and may cumulatively increase discrimination at downstream steps. MutS-homolog binding selectivity and the well-known but poorly understood effects of DNA-sequence contexts on recognition may thus be primary determinants of MMR specificity and efficiency. MMR processes that modulate UV mutagenesis might begin with selective binding by MutS homologs of "mismatched" T[CPD]T/AG and T[6--4]T/AG photoproducts, reported previously for hMutSalpha and described here for E. coli MutS protein. If MMR suppresses UV mutagenesis by acting directly on pre-mutagenic products of replicative bypass, mismatched photoproducts should be recognized in most DNA-sequence contexts. In three of four contexts tested here (three substantially different), T[CPD]T/AG was bound only slightly better by MutS than was T[CPD]T/AA or homoduplex DNA; only one of two contexts tested promoted selective binding of T[6--4]T/AG. Although the T:G pairs in T[CPD]T/AG and T/G both adopt wobble conformations, MutS bound T/G well in all contexts (K(1/2) 2.1--2.9 nM). Thus, MutS appears to select the two mismatches by different mechanisms. NMR analyses elsewhere suggest that in the (highly distorted) T[6--4]T/AG a forked H-bond between O2 of the 3' thymine and the ring 1-imino and exocyclic 2-amino guanine protons stabilizes a novel planar structure not possible in T[6--4]T/AA. Replacement of G by purines lacking one (inosine, 2-aminopurine) or both (nebularine) protons markedly reduced or eliminated selective MutS binding, as predicted. Previous studies and the work here, taken together, suggest that in only about half of DNA sequence contexts could MutS (and presumably MutSalpha) selectively bind mismatched UV photoproducts and directly suppress UV mutagenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15996534     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  11 in total

1.  Mismatch repair proteins recruited to ultraviolet light-damaged sites lead to degradation of licensing factor Cdt1 in the G1 phase.

Authors:  Miyuki Tanaka; Michiyo Takahara; Kohei Nukina; Akiyo Hayashi; Wataru Sakai; Kaoru Sugasawa; Yasushi Shiomi; Hideo Nishitani
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Rapid DNA double-strand breaks resulting from processing of Cr-DNA cross-links by both MutS dimers.

Authors:  Mindy F Reynolds; Elizabeth C Peterson-Roth; Ivan A Bespalov; Tatiana Johnston; Volkan M Gurel; Haley L Menard; Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Binding of mismatch repair protein MutS to mispaired DNA adducts of intercalating ruthenium(II) arene complexes.

Authors:  Maria Castellano-Castillo; Hana Kostrhunova; Victoria Marini; Jana Kasparkova; Peter J Sadler; Jean-Marc Malinge; Viktor Brabec
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.358

4.  Rapid induction of chromatin-associated DNA mismatch repair proteins after MNNG treatment.

Authors:  Allen G Schroering; Kandace J Williams
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-05-12

5.  Effects of accessory proteins on the bypass of a cis-syn thymine-thymine dimer by Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase eta.

Authors:  Scott D McCulloch; Adam Wood; Parie Garg; Peter M J Burgers; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  A single hydrophobic cleft in the Escherichia coli processivity clamp is sufficient to support cell viability and DNA damage-induced mutagenesis in vivo.

Authors:  Mark D Sutton; Jill M Duzen; Sarah K Scouten Ponticelli
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.946

7.  Alkyltransferase-like protein (eATL) prevents mismatch repair-mediated toxicity induced by O6-alkylguanine adducts in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Gerard Mazon; Gaëlle Philippin; Jean Cadet; Didier Gasparutto; Mauro Modesti; Robert P Fuchs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  G-quadruplex recognition activities of E. Coli MutS.

Authors:  Edward A Ehrat; Bradley R Johnson; Jonathan D Williams; Glen M Borchert; Erik D Larson
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.946

9.  Human MLH1 protein participates in genomic damage checkpoint signaling in response to DNA interstrand crosslinks, while MSH2 functions in DNA repair.

Authors:  Qi Wu; Karen M Vasquez
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Binding of MutS protein to oligonucleotides containing a methylated or an ethylated guanine residue, and correlation with mutation frequency.

Authors:  Kentaro Taira; Shintaro Nakamura; Khota Nakano; Daisuke Maehara; Keinosuke Okamoto; Sakae Arimoto; David Loakes; Leroy Worth; Roel M Schaaper; Kohji Seio; Mitsuo Sekine; Kazuo Negishi; Tomoe Negishi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 2.433

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.