OBJECTIVE: Patients with multilevel aortic disease represent a small subgroup with the need for extensive surgical treatment at considerable risk. We present our experience of endovascular exclusion for simultaneous thoracic and abdominal aortic disease in four patients. METHODS: Between January 2002 and January 2005, four patients underwent endovascular repair for simultaneous thoracic and abdominal aortic disease. Mean age was 69+/-10 years (range, 60-81). Thoracic lesions included penetrating aortic ulcer (n=2, ruptured=1), atherosclerotic aneurysm (n=1), and chronic type B dissection (n=1). Abdominal aortic disease included atherosclerotic infrarenal (n=3) and juxtarenal (n=1) aortic aneurysms. Thoracic aortic stent-grafts had been the following: Excluder/TAG (n=3) or Talent (n=1) straight tube devices. Abdominal aortic stent-grafts used were as following: Excluder (n=3) or Zenith (n=1). All patients were followed-up with CT-angiography and chest X-rays 1, 4, 12 months after the procedure, and once per year thereafter. RESULTS: Stent-graft deployment was technically successful in all cases. Intraoperative mortality was not observed. Mean procedure time was 94+/-34 min (range, 70-145). Early postoperative complications occurred in one patient that developed acute renal failure but dialysis was not required. Mean hospitalisation was 8+/-5 days (range, 4-15). Late death occurred in one patient for an undetected ruptured thoracic type 1 endoleak. All three survivors are currently well 16.5 months (range, 3-36) after surgery. No neurological complications developed. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous abdominal and thoracic endovascular repair for multilevel aortic disease is feasible and could be a viable alternative in high-risk patients, who otherwise may not be suitable candidates for conventional repair.
OBJECTIVE:Patients with multilevel aortic disease represent a small subgroup with the need for extensive surgical treatment at considerable risk. We present our experience of endovascular exclusion for simultaneous thoracic and abdominal aortic disease in four patients. METHODS: Between January 2002 and January 2005, four patients underwent endovascular repair for simultaneous thoracic and abdominal aortic disease. Mean age was 69+/-10 years (range, 60-81). Thoracic lesions included penetrating aortic ulcer (n=2, ruptured=1), atherosclerotic aneurysm (n=1), and chronic type B dissection (n=1). Abdominal aortic disease included atherosclerotic infrarenal (n=3) and juxtarenal (n=1) aortic aneurysms. Thoracic aortic stent-grafts had been the following: Excluder/TAG (n=3) or Talent (n=1) straight tube devices. Abdominal aortic stent-grafts used were as following: Excluder (n=3) or Zenith (n=1). All patients were followed-up with CT-angiography and chest X-rays 1, 4, 12 months after the procedure, and once per year thereafter. RESULTS: Stent-graft deployment was technically successful in all cases. Intraoperative mortality was not observed. Mean procedure time was 94+/-34 min (range, 70-145). Early postoperative complications occurred in one patient that developed acute renal failure but dialysis was not required. Mean hospitalisation was 8+/-5 days (range, 4-15). Late death occurred in one patient for an undetected ruptured thoracic type 1 endoleak. All three survivors are currently well 16.5 months (range, 3-36) after surgery. No neurological complications developed. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous abdominal and thoracic endovascular repair for multilevel aortic disease is feasible and could be a viable alternative in high-risk patients, who otherwise may not be suitable candidates for conventional repair.