Literature DB >> 15995527

Continuous facial nerve monitoring during pleomorphic adenoma recurrence surgery.

Marc Makeieff1, Frédéric Venail, César Cartier, Renaud Garrel, Louis Crampette, Bernard Guerrier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Surgery of recurrent pleomorphic adenoma (RPA) is known to lead to a high facial nerve complication rate. The efficacy of the continuous facial nerve monitoring (CFNM) technique remains to be proven in RPA surgery. The goal was thus to evaluate facial nerve palsy rates and the recovery period after parotidectomy for RPA using CFNM by way of continuous electromyography and to compare these rates and the operation time with those of patients who had undergone surgery without facial nerve monitoring.
DESIGN: Cohort study. PATIENTS: Forty-seven patients were referred for RPA (1981-2003). Among them, 32 (18 unmonitored and 14 monitored) patients displayed no preoperative facial palsy, and histologic analyses revealed evidence of recurrence. The operation time and the extent and duration of postoperative facial nerve palsy were examined in both groups (monitored vs. unmonitored). Both groups had a similar clinical appearance distribution.
RESULTS: Facial nerve paralysis was estimated using the House-Brackmann grading scale. CFNM reduced the intensity of facial nerve paralysis independently of the kind of surgery performed. The complete deficit rates were 0% for the monitored group and 5.6% for the unmonitored group. Postoperative facial nerve paralysis was significantly lower (P = .01) in the monitored group than in the unmonitored group. CFNM improved the duration of facial paralysis (P = .001) in the monitored group. The operation time was significantly lower in the monitored group than in the unmonitored group (P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of CFNM during RPA surgery improves the surgical outcome. The facial nerve deficit can be reduced, and the recovery of facial nerve function is faster.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15995527     DOI: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000166697.48868.8C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  9 in total

1.  Optical stimulation of the facial nerve: a new monitoring technique?

Authors:  Ingo Ulrik Teudt; Adam E Nevel; Agnella D Izzo; Joseph T Walsh; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Histopathologic and functional effects of facial nerve following electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Emrah Sapmaz; Irfan Kaygusuz; Hayrettin Cengiz Alpay; Nusret Akpolat; Erol Keles; Turgut Karlidag; Israfil Orhan; Sinasi Yalcin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Is surgical excision of lipomas arising from the parotid gland systematically required?

Authors:  Nicolas Fakhry; Justin Michel; Arthur Varoquaux; François Antonini; Laure Santini; Aude Lagier; Florence Turner; Patrick Dessi; Antoine Giovanni
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Contemporary management of tumors of the salivary glands.

Authors:  Joseph M Scianna; Guy J Petruzzelli
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Management of parotid gland surgery in a university teaching hospital.

Authors:  Sophie Deneuve; Stephanie Quesnel; Joel Depondt; Sebastien Albert; Alexandra Panajotopoulos; Pierre Gehanno; Beatrix Barry
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Facial Nerve Monitoring During Parotidectomy:A Two-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Stanislas Ballivet-de Régloix; Julia Grinholtz-Haddad; Olga Maurin; Louise Genestier; Quentin Lisan; Yoann Pons
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07

Review 7.  Patient safety and quality improvements in parotid surgery.

Authors:  Vidit Talati; Hannah J Brown; Tasher Losenegger; Peter Revenaugh; Samer Al-Khudari
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-04-27

8.  Recurrent Parotid Pleomorphic Adenomas: Our Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Özgür Kümüş; Ahmet Ömer İkiz; Sülen Sarıoğlu; Taner Kemal Erdağ
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-01

9.  First branchial cleft fistula: a difficult challenge.

Authors:  Corneliu Mircea Codreanu; Corneliu Codreanu; Margareta Codreanu
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.