Literature DB >> 15995512

Laryngopharyngeal reflux: prospective cohort study evaluating optimal dose of proton-pump inhibitor therapy and pretherapy predictors of response.

Woosuk Park1, Douglas M Hicks, Farah Khandwala, Joel E Richter, Tom I Abelson, Claudio Milstein, Michael F Vaezi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is frequently treated with empiric proton-pump inhibitors (PPI), but the optimal dosing and duration is unknown. We performed an open label prospective cohort study to evaluate whether twice-daily (BID) PPI is more effective than once-daily (QD) PPI for the treatment of LPR.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with LPR based on ear, nose, and throat (ENT) symptoms and laryngoscopy findings were enrolled. Questionnaire assessed demographics, ENT symptoms, symptom severity, and exposure to other potential laryngeal irritants. Esophageal manometry, ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were performed before initiation of therapy. Patients were consecutively assigned to three groups: BID PPI (lansoprazole 30 mg BID), BID PPI + H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA; omeprazole 20 mg BID + ranitidine 300 mg each night), or QD PPI (esomeprazole 40 mg QD). Greater than 50% primary symptom improvement from baseline defined symptom response. At 2 month follow-up, the same PPI dose was continued for responders, and PPIs were doubled for nonresponders for an additional 2 months. Repeat symptom assessment and laryngoscopy performed at 4 month follow-up.
RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were enrolled (median age 49 years, interquartile range 44.0 - 65.0; 76% white; 34% male). Treatment groups were BID PPI for 30 patients, BID PPI + H2RA for 30 patients, and QD PPI for 25 patients. RESPONSE TO THERAPY: At 2 months, BID response occurred among 15 of 30 (50%) patients, BID + H2RA for 15 of 30 (50%), and QD for 7 of 25 (28%) (P = .03). No statistical difference found between the two BID PPI groups with and without H2RA. Among the QD group nonresponders, 7 of 13 (54%) achieved symptom response with additional 2 months of BID dosing. At 4 month follow-up, an additional 22% of responses were obtained from the two BID groups (43/60, 72%). The overall response rate for all three groups was 70% (54/77). PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME: Pretherapy interarytenoid mucosa and true vocal folds abnormalities were associated with twofold increase in symptom response (odds ratio 1.99 and 1.96, respectively, P = .017).
CONCLUSION: BID PPI appears to be more effective than QD PPI in achieving clinical symptom response in suspected LPR. More response was achieved at 4 months compared with 2 months. Therefore, aggressive acid suppression with BID PPI for at least 4 months is warranted for treatment of LPR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15995512     DOI: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163746.81766.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  40 in total

Review 1.  Globus pharyngeus: a review of its etiology, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Bong Eun Lee; Gwang Ha Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Advances in GERD: Current Developments in the Management of Acid-Related GI Disorders.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2009-06

Review 3.  Atypical manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-10-27

Review 4.  [Postoperative care in operative laryngology].

Authors:  T Nawka
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Optimal treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

Authors:  Irene Martinucci; Nicola de Bortoli; Edoardo Savarino; Andrea Nacci; Salvatore Osvaldo Romeo; Massimo Bellini; Vincenzo Savarino; Bruno Fattori; Santino Marchi
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Prospective, observational study using rabeprazole in 455 patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

Authors:  Yoon Se Lee; Seung-Ho Choi; Young Ik Son; Young-Hak Park; Sang Yoon Kim; Soon Yuhl Nam
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Evaluation of patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux: a practical approach.

Authors:  Anas Abou-Ismail; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-06

Review 8.  Globus pharyngeus: a review of etiology, diagnostics, and treatment.

Authors:  Pia Järvenpää; Perttu Arkkila; Leena-Maija Aaltonen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  The Difficult-to-Control Asthmatic: A Systematic Approach.

Authors:  Annie V Le; Ronald A Simon
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.406

10.  Comparison of Direct Medical Care Costs Between Erosive Reflux Disease and Non-erosive Reflux Disease in Korean Tertiary Medical Center.

Authors:  Pyoung Ju Seo; Nayoung Kim; Jane C Oh; Byoung Hwan Lee; Cheol Min Shin; Seungchul Suh; Hyunkyung Park; Ryoung Hee Nam; Jin A Cha; Young Soo Park; Dong Ho Lee
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.