Literature DB >> 15995476

Influence of personal armor on distribution of entry wounds: lessons learned from urban-setting warfare fatalities.

Yona Kosashvili1, Jehuda Hiss, Nadav Davidovic, Guy Lin, Boaz Kalmovic, Eitan Melamed, Yehezkel Levy, Amir Blumenfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to examine the distribution of entry wounds resulting from firearms and shrapnel in soldiers wearing military personal armor systems (MPAS) in low-intensity urban combat conditions.
METHODS: Data were collected for a retrospective analysis on all combat fatalities sustained by the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) between March 30, 2002, and April 22, 2002, during Defensive Shield Operation in the West Bank. Twenty-six of the 30 fatalities were evaluated in the Israeli National Center of Forensic Medicine.
RESULTS: A total of 149 entrance wounds were divided into shrapnel and bullet groups. The "face-neck" region had the highest density rate compared with other body regions in both shrapnel and bullet groups (2.97 and 2.41, respectively; p < 0.0001). In both groups, the overall prevalence of anterior injuries was significantly higher than posterior ones (78.9% vs. 21.1% in the shrapnel group and 68.5% vs. 31.5% in the bullet group, p < 0.001). However, anterior and posterior chest injuries had a reverse yet more even distribution (43.8% and 56.2% in the bullet group and 40% and 60% in the shrapnel group, respectively; p < 0.001). The difference in the average diameters of entry wounds in the covered versus uncovered regions (0.79 +/- 0.42 cm vs. 0.73 +/- 0.29 cm, respectively) was not statistically significant (p = 0.11).
CONCLUSION: The use of MPAS turned the face-neck region into the most vulnerable body part, as shown by its prominent density rate, especially in the shrapnel group. MPAS designed for urban setting warfare should provide maximal shielding both to the anterior and posterior chest regions. The diameter of entrance wounds in the covered versus the uncovered areas was not statistically significant, suggesting that only a minor deformation of the bullet takes place while traversing the Kevlar vest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15995476     DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000169804.17603.76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  5 in total

1.  Contemporary body armor: technical data, injuries, and limits.

Authors:  N Prat; F Rongieras; J-C Sarron; A Miras; E Voiglio
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Treatment protocol for high velocity/high energy gunshot injuries to the face.

Authors:  Micha Peled; Yoav Leiser; Omri Emodi; Amir Krausz
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-03

3.  [Limb salvage and amputation after trauma : Decision criteria and management algorithm].

Authors:  C Krettek; A Lerner; P Giannoudis; C Willy; C W Müller
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Development of a Bayesian model to estimate health care outcomes in the severely wounded.

Authors:  Alexander Stojadinovic; John Eberhardt; Trevor S Brown; Jason S Hawksworth; Frederick Gage; Douglas K Tadaki; Jonathan A Forsberg; Thomas A Davis; Benjamin K Potter; James R Dunne; E A Elster
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2010-08-16

5.  Evaluating new types of tourniquets by the Israeli Naval special warfare unit.

Authors:  Eitan Heldenberg; Shahar Aharony; Tamir Wolf; Tali Vishne
Journal:  Disaster Mil Med       Date:  2015-01-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.