BACKGROUND: The pharmacodynamics of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists includes an initial 'flare-up' of the pituitary-gonadal axis, followed by reduced luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion. The question is if combining a short-acting antagonist with a long-acting agonist can diminish gonadotropin flare-up. METHODS: To achieve quick downregulation in patients with recently diagnosed central precocious puberty (CPP, 7 patients) or short stature with short predicted final height (3 patients), we combined the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix (3 subcutaneous injections every 72 h) at the beginning of GnRH agonist treatment (leuprorelin or triptorelin) in 6 patients and compared the effect to 4 patients treated solely with GnRH agonist. To monitor effects, we measured LH and FSH concentrations in urine collected from initial morning urination during the first month of treatment. RESULTS: In both treatment groups, gonadotropin flare-up could be detected in urine levels increased due to the flare-up phenomenon which was of short duration (<5 days) in the majority (5 of 6) of combined-treated patients and in the minority (1 of 4) of patients treated by agonist alone. During the first 10 days of treatment, mean LH concentration measured in urine was significantly lower in 4 CPP patients treated by the combined therapy compared to 3 CPP patients treated by the agonist only (mean LH combined therapy: 10.4 +/- 2.8 vs. 20.1 +/- 11.0 mU/ml in the agonist-only group, mean +/- SEM, p < 0.05). Significant correlations between stimulated serum LH in GnRH test prior to treatment and maximum urine LH after initiating GnRH analogue treatment (r = 0.547, p = 0.043), as well as basal serum LH and basal urine LH (r = 0.685, p = 0.014) were found. CONCLUSION: Combined GnRH agonist and antagonist treatment led to rapid gonadotropin suppression. Also, urine measurements of LH and FSH seemed suitable for monitoring gonadotropin-inhibiting or -stimulating properties of GnRH analogues in individual patients. However, a controlled trial of a larger patient cohort is required to decide which treatment is the most effective.
BACKGROUND: The pharmacodynamics of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists includes an initial 'flare-up' of the pituitary-gonadal axis, followed by reduced luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion. The question is if combining a short-acting antagonist with a long-acting agonist can diminish gonadotropin flare-up. METHODS: To achieve quick downregulation in patients with recently diagnosed central precocious puberty (CPP, 7 patients) or short stature with short predicted final height (3 patients), we combined the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix (3 subcutaneous injections every 72 h) at the beginning of GnRH agonist treatment (leuprorelin or triptorelin) in 6 patients and compared the effect to 4 patients treated solely with GnRH agonist. To monitor effects, we measured LH and FSH concentrations in urine collected from initial morning urination during the first month of treatment. RESULTS: In both treatment groups, gonadotropin flare-up could be detected in urine levels increased due to the flare-up phenomenon which was of short duration (<5 days) in the majority (5 of 6) of combined-treated patients and in the minority (1 of 4) of patients treated by agonist alone. During the first 10 days of treatment, mean LH concentration measured in urine was significantly lower in 4 CPP patients treated by the combined therapy compared to 3 CPP patients treated by the agonist only (mean LH combined therapy: 10.4 +/- 2.8 vs. 20.1 +/- 11.0 mU/ml in the agonist-only group, mean +/- SEM, p < 0.05). Significant correlations between stimulated serum LH in GnRH test prior to treatment and maximum urine LH after initiating GnRH analogue treatment (r = 0.547, p = 0.043), as well as basal serum LH and basal urine LH (r = 0.685, p = 0.014) were found. CONCLUSION: Combined GnRH agonist and antagonist treatment led to rapid gonadotropin suppression. Also, urine measurements of LH and FSH seemed suitable for monitoring gonadotropin-inhibiting or -stimulating properties of GnRH analogues in individual patients. However, a controlled trial of a larger patient cohort is required to decide which treatment is the most effective.