| Literature DB >> 15994355 |
C Gannon1.
Abstract
A request to admit a hospital inpatient with motor neurone disease to the hospice generated unusual unease. Significantly, withdrawal of ventilation had already been planned. The presumption that ventilation would be withdrawn after transfer presented a dilemma. Should the hospice accept the admission? If so, should the hospice staff stop the ventilation, and then when and how? Debate centred on the continuity of best interests and the logistics of withdrawing ventilation. The factors making the request contentious identified competing interests within hospice admission decision making that could detrimentally impact on patient care.Entities:
Keywords: Death and Euthanasia
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15994355 PMCID: PMC1734182 DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.010777
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN: 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903