Literature DB >> 1599347

The clonidine suppression test for pheochromocytoma. A review of its utility and pitfalls.

R J Sjoberg1, K J Simcic, G S Kidd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The intent of this study is to retrospectively evaluate our experience, as well as all published information, regarding the clonidine suppression test to determine its utility, accuracy, and safety in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 22 patients (including four with pheochromocytoma) evaluated at a major military referral hospital with the clonidine suppression test for suspected pheochromocytoma for more than 6 years were retrospectively reviewed. All published series of patients similarly evaluated were also critically reviewed.
RESULTS: All studies confirm that a nonstressed plasma norepinephrine of more than 2000 pg/mL is diagnostic of pheochromocytoma. In those patients with a plasma norepinephrine of less than 2000 pg/mL, the clonidine suppression test is 92% accurate in diagnosing pheochromocytoma when the normal response to clonidine is defined as total plasma catecholamines of less than 500 pg/mL. Its accuracy diminishes in patients with low baseline plasma catecholamine levels, who may better be tested with a stimulatory test (ie, glucagon). The use of diuretics, beta-blockers, and antidepressants may cause false-positive results or severe hypotension during the clonidine suppression test. Those previously treated with clonidine or with baroreceptor dysfunction may also be prone to severe hypotension, but this complication is otherwise uncommon after acute clonidine ingestion.
CONCLUSION: Although it is rarely necessary for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma, the clonidine suppression test is an accurate and safe test in a select group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1599347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  9 in total

1.  Clinical experience over 48 years with pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  R E Goldstein; J A O'Neill; G W Holcomb; W M Morgan; W W Neblett; J A Oates; N Brown; J Nadeau; B Smith; D L Page; N N Abumrad; H W Scott
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Hypertension in patients with pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  N N Hanna; D E Kenady
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Advances in biochemical screening for phaeochromocytoma using biogenic amines.

Authors:  Malcolm J Whiting; Matthew P Doogue
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2009-02

Review 4.  Treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  R Adjallé; P F Plouin; K Pacak; H Lehnert
Journal:  Horm Metab Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 2.936

5.  Pheochromocytoma in Urologic Practice.

Authors:  Nikhil Waingankar; Gennady Bratslavsky; Camilo Jimenez; Paul Russo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2016-09-28

Review 6.  Pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  William M Manger; Ray W Gifford
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Dexmedetomidine induced catecholamine suppression in pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Sanjeev Singh; Arti Singh
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2014-01

8.  The association between systolic blood pressure reduction during clonidine suppression testing and the decrease in plasma catecholamines and metanephrines.

Authors:  Tiran Golani; Boris Fishman; Yehonatan Sharabi; Yael Olswang-Kutz; Avshalom Leibowitz; Ehud Grossman; Gadi Shlomai
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Adrenal Lymphangioma Masquerading as a Catecholamine Producing Tumor.

Authors:  Israel Hodish; Lindsay Schmidt; Andreas G Moraitis
Journal:  Case Rep Endocrinol       Date:  2015-11-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.