Literature DB >> 15993401

On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation.

Paul E Dux1, Veronika Coltheart, Irina M Harris.   

Abstract

Observers demonstrate an impaired ability to report the second of two targets in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream if it appears within 500 ms of the first target--a phenomenon known as the attentional blink. This study investigated the fate of stimuli in dual-target RSVP streams that do not require report--the distractors. In five experiments, observers viewed dual-target RSVP streams where the items flanking Target 1 either had the same identity (repeats) or a different identity (non-repeats). Repeated distractors reduced the attentional blink, but only if two conditions were met (1) the items flanking Target 1 were featurally identical and (2) the distractors were drawn from a different alphanumeric category to the targets (e.g. digits vs. letters). We interpret this reduced blink magnitude in the repeat trials as evidence that in RSVP streams distractor items that appear in close temporal proximity to Target 1 are inhibited and we propose that this inhibition occurs both at the level of alphanumeric features and abstract identities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15993401     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  7 in total

1.  On the failure of distractor inhibition in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; Irina M Harris
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

2.  Priming the semantic neighbourhood during the attentional blink.

Authors:  Irina M Harris; Michael J J Little
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  The attentional blink: a review of data and theory.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; René Marois
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Negative priming under rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  Kin Fai Ellick Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in recovery from the attentional blink.

Authors:  Heleen A Slagter; Katerina Georgopoulou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Individual differences in the attentional blink: the temporal profile of blinkers and non-blinkers.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Stefan M Wierda; Eva van Viegen; Sander Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; René Marois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.