Literature DB >> 15993232

Herd immunity conferred by killed oral cholera vaccines in Bangladesh: a reanalysis.

Mohammad Ali1, Michael Emch, Lorenz von Seidlein, Mohammad Yunus, David A Sack, Malla Rao, Jan Holmgren, John D Clemens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decisions about the use of killed oral cholera vaccines, which confer moderate levels of direct protection to vaccinees, can depend on whether the vaccines also provide indirect (herd) protection when high levels of vaccine coverage are attained. We reanalysed data from a field trial in Bangladesh to ascertain whether there is evidence of indirect protection from killed oral cholera vaccines.
METHODS: We analysed the first year of surveillance data from a placebo-controlled trial of B subunit-killed whole-cell and killed whole-cell-only oral cholera vaccines in children and adult women in Bangladesh. We calculated whether there was an inverse, monotonic trend for the relation between the level of vaccine coverage in a residential cluster and the incidence of cholera in individual vaccine recipients or placebo recipients residing in the cluster after controlling for potential confounding variables.
FINDINGS: Vaccine coverage of the targeted population ranged from 4% to 65%. Incidence rates of cholera among placebo recipients were inversely related to levels of vaccine coverage (7.01 cases per 1000 in the lowest quintile of coverage vs 1.47 cases per 1000 in the highest quintile; p<0.0001 for trend). Receipt of vaccine by an individual and the level of vaccine coverage of the individual's cluster were independently related to a reduced risk of cholera. Moreover, after adjustment for the level of vaccine coverage of the cluster, vaccine protective efficacy remained significant (55% [95% CI 41-66], p<0.0001).
INTERPRETATION: In addition to providing direct protection to vaccine recipients, killed oral cholera vaccines confer significant herd protection to neighbouring non-vaccinated individuals. Use of these vaccines could have a major effect on the burden of cholera in endemic settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15993232     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66550-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  117 in total

1.  Estimating the reproductive numbers for the 2008-2009 cholera outbreaks in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Zindoga Mukandavire; Shu Liao; Jin Wang; Holly Gaff; David L Smith; J Glenn Morris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  New-generation vaccines against cholera.

Authors:  John Clemens; Sunheang Shin; Dipika Sur; G Balakrish Nair; Jan Holmgren
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide.

Authors:  F E Andre; R Booy; H L Bock; J Clemens; S K Datta; T J John; B W Lee; S Lolekha; H Peltola; T A Ruff; M Santosham; H J Schmitt
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Toward Causal Inference With Interference.

Authors:  Michael G Hudgens; M Elizabeth Halloran
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Infection: mass vaccination is feasible in response to cholera epidemics.

Authors:  Amit Saha; Firdausi Qadri
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Safety and immunogenicity of single-dose live oral cholera vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR, prepared from new master and working cell banks.

Authors:  Wilbur H Chen; Richard N Greenberg; Marcela F Pasetti; Sofie Livio; Michael Lock; Marc Gurwith; Myron M Levine
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-10-30

7.  Effect partitioning under interference in two-stage randomized vaccine trials.

Authors:  Tyler J Vanderweele; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 0.870

8.  Distance to health services affects local-level vaccine efficacy for pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) among rural Filipino children.

Authors:  Elisabeth Dowling Root; Marilla Lucero; Hanna Nohynek; Peter Anthamatten; Deborah S K Thomas; Veronica Tallo; Antti Tanskanen; Beatriz P Quiambao; Taneli Puumalainen; Socorro P Lupisan; Petri Ruutu; Erma Ladesma; Gail M Williams; Ian Riley; Eric A F Simões
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A spatiotemporal analysis of non-medical exemptions from vaccination: California schools before and after SB277.

Authors:  Paul L Delamater; Timothy F Leslie; Y Tony Yang
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Large sample randomization inference of causal effects in the presence of interference.

Authors:  Lan Liu; Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.