OBJECTIVES: To perform a retrospective study to determine the clinical utility of Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) and to determine its role in the management of transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS). METHODS: Patients undergoing DUS between January 1998 and January 2001 for clinical suspicion of TRAS were included in the study. A total of 51 patients were divided into two groups according to the peak systolic velocity. Additional management was based on the clinical and DUS findings and their congruence. Patients were followed up and their outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 51 patients who entered the study, 26 were in the low probability group (LPG) and 25 in the high probability group (HPG). Nine patients in the LPG underwent additional investigations; eight underwent magnetic resonance angiography and one angiography. Of these 9 patients, 6 had stenosis, 4 of whom required angiography. In total, 5 patients from the LPG underwent angioplasty, and 4 of them had stenosis (1 with TRAS, 2 with common iliac artery stenosis, and 1 with renal artery ostial stenosis). Three patients underwent angioplasty and 2 of them improved. In the HPG, 20 of 25 patients underwent additional investigations, including magnetic resonance angiography in 12 and angiography in 8, with stenosis in 15 patients. Of the HPG, 13 of 25 patients underwent angiography, with 10 requiring angioplasty--8 for TRAS and 2 for adjacent renal artery stenosis, with improvement in 8 patients. Congruent clinical and DUS findings were highly predictive of significant stenosis more amenable to improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that high-probability DUS and congruent clinical findings are likely to identify a significant stenosis that is amenable to treatment. Low-probability DUS findings do not eliminate the possibility of stenosis, but intervention in this group is less likely to result in improvement.
OBJECTIVES: To perform a retrospective study to determine the clinical utility of Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) and to determine its role in the management of transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS). METHODS:Patients undergoing DUS between January 1998 and January 2001 for clinical suspicion of TRAS were included in the study. A total of 51 patients were divided into two groups according to the peak systolic velocity. Additional management was based on the clinical and DUS findings and their congruence. Patients were followed up and their outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 51 patients who entered the study, 26 were in the low probability group (LPG) and 25 in the high probability group (HPG). Nine patients in the LPG underwent additional investigations; eight underwent magnetic resonance angiography and one angiography. Of these 9 patients, 6 had stenosis, 4 of whom required angiography. In total, 5 patients from the LPG underwent angioplasty, and 4 of them had stenosis (1 with TRAS, 2 with common iliac artery stenosis, and 1 with renal artery ostial stenosis). Three patients underwent angioplasty and 2 of them improved. In the HPG, 20 of 25 patients underwent additional investigations, including magnetic resonance angiography in 12 and angiography in 8, with stenosis in 15 patients. Of the HPG, 13 of 25 patients underwent angiography, with 10 requiring angioplasty--8 for TRAS and 2 for adjacent renal artery stenosis, with improvement in 8 patients. Congruent clinical and DUS findings were highly predictive of significant stenosis more amenable to improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that high-probability DUS and congruent clinical findings are likely to identify a significant stenosis that is amenable to treatment. Low-probability DUS findings do not eliminate the possibility of stenosis, but intervention in this group is less likely to result in improvement.
Authors: Ulf H Beier; Eunice John; Adisorn Lumpaopong; Jennifer G Co; Vladimir Jelnin; Enrico Benedetti; Giuliano Testa; Ramona Bottke; Bruce I Sharon; Carlos E Ruiz Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2006-03-07 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Maria Koukoulaki; Elias Brountzos; Ioannis Loukopoulos; Maria Pomoni; Eleni Antypa; Vasileios Vougas; Spiros Drakopoulos Journal: World J Transplant Date: 2015-06-24
Authors: G Guzzardi; R Fossaceca; I Di Gesù; P Cerini; M Di Terlizzi; C Stanca; E Malatesta; D Moniaci; P Brustia; P Stratta; A Carriero Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 3.469