Literature DB >> 15991664

Modeling mercury fluxes and concentrations in a Georgia watershed receiving atmospheric deposition load from direct and indirect sources.

Robert B Ambrose1, Ioannis X Tsiros, Tim A Wool.   

Abstract

This paper presents a modeling analysis of airborne mercury (Hg) deposited on the Ochlockonee River watershed located in Georgia. Atmospheric deposition monitoring and source attribution data were used along with simulation models to calculate Hg buildup in the subwatershed soils, its subsequent runoff loading and delivery through the tributaries, and its ultimate fate in the mainstem river. The terrestrial model calculated annual watershed yields for total Hg ranging from 0.7 to 1.1 microg/m2. Results suggest that approximately two-thirds of the atmospherically deposited Hg to the watershed is returned to the atmosphere, 10% is delivered to the river, and the rest is retained in the watershed. A check of the aquatic model results against survey data showed a reasonable agreement. Comparing observed and simulated total and methylmercury concentrations gave root mean square error values of 0.26 and 0.10 ng/L, respectively, in the water column, and 5.9 and 1 ng/g, respectively, in the upper sediment layer. Sensitivity analysis results imply that mercury in the Ochlockonee River is dominated by watershed runoff inputs and not by direct atmospheric deposition, and that methylmercury concentrations in the river are determined mainly by net methylation rates in the watershed, presumably in wetted soils and in the wetlands feeding the river.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15991664     DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2005.10464643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  4 in total

1.  Spatial and interspecific patterns in persistent contaminant loads in bighead and silver carp from the Illinois River.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Levengood; David J Soucek; Amy Dickinson; Gregory G Sass; John M Epifanio
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Shallow groundwater mercury supply in a Coastal Plain stream.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Celeste A Journey; Mark A Lowery; Mark E Brigham; Douglas A Burns; Daniel T Button; Francis H Chapelle; Michelle A Lutz; Mark C Marvin-Dipasquale; Karen Riva-Murray
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  WASP 8: The Next Generation in the 50-year Evolution of USEPA's Water Quality Model.

Authors:  Tim Wool; Robert B Ambrose; James L Martin; Alex Comer
Journal:  Water (Basel)       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 3.103

4.  Sources of mercury exposure for U.S. seafood consumers: implications for policy.

Authors:  Noelle E Selin; Elsie M Sunderland; Christopher D Knightes; Robert P Mason
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.