Literature DB >> 15991135

Metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty: no way under the sun!--in opposition.

Thomas P Schmalzried1.   

Abstract

The functional demands and the longevity of hip arthroplasty patients are increasing. High volumetric wear and osteolysis limit the durability of metal-ultra high molecular weight polyethylene resurfacing. Cemented femoral hemiresurfacing components (no acetabular component) do not develop osteolysis and rarely loosen. Consistent long-term fixation has been demonstrated with hemispherical cementless acetabular components. Metal-metal bearings have demonstrated low wear and rare osteolysis over 3 decades of use. These facts form foundation for total hip resurfacing with metal-metal bearings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15991135     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  [Reasons for failure of hip resurfacing implants. A failure analysis based on 250 revision specimens].

Authors:  M M Morlock; N Bishop; F Stahmer; J Zustin; G Sauter; M Hahn; M Krause; W Rüther; M Amling
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Can patients return to high-impact physical activities after hip resurfacing? A prospective study.

Authors:  Julien Girard; Bruno Miletic; Anthony Deny; Henri Migaud; Nicolas Fouilleron
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-02-01

4.  Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wael A Rahman; Nelson V Greidanus; Alexander Siegmeth; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.