Literature DB >> 15991069

Progressive increase of bowel wall thickness is a reliable indicator for surgery in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Shyr-Chyr Chen1, Chien-Chang Lee, Chiung-Yuan Hsu, Zui-Shen Yen, Cheng-Chung Fang, Matthew H-M Ma, Wen-Jone Chen, Hong-Shiee Lai, Po-Huang Lee, Fang-Yue Lin, Wei-Jao Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether progressive increase of bowel wall thickness during nonoperative treatment is a reliable indicator for surgery in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction.
METHODS: The study consisted of a prospective case series of 121 patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction who underwent an abdominal ultrasonographic examination. The results of ultrasonographic examinations were classified into two groups according to the presence (Group I) or absence (Group II) of bowel wall thickening. Bowel wall thickening was recognized as a visible small bowel wall > or =3 mm in width as seen by ultrasonographic examination. The findings of subsequent ultrasonographic examinations taken 24 hours later were compared with those taken at admission. Surgery was determined based on the presence of any toxic signs or the failure of nonoperative treatment. The number of patients who had successful nonoperative treatment, the number of patients who underwent surgeries, and the number of complications in each group were calculated to correlate with the ultrasonographic findings.
RESULTS: There are 49 and 72 patients in Groups I and II, respectively. The number of patients who had successful nonoperative treatment and number of patients who underwent surgeries in Group I are 40 (81.6 percent) and 9 (18.4 percent) and in Group II the numbers are 68 (94.4 percent) and four (5.6 percent), respectively (P = 0.036). All 12 (100 percent) patients with progressive increase of bowel wall thickness underwent surgery. Progressive increase of bowel wall thickness as an indicator for surgery has a sensitivity of 92.3 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 62.1-99.6 percent) and a specificity of 100 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 95.7-100 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with initial bowel wall thickening have a higher incidence of surgery, and progressive increase of bowel wall thickness that appears 24 hours later is a reliable indicator for surgery in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15991069     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0112-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  4 in total

1.  Parameter predicting the recurrence of adhesive small bowel obstruction in patients managed with a long tube.

Authors:  Takumi Sakakibara; Akio Harada; Tadao Ishikawa; Yoshinao Komatsu; Toyohisa Yaguchi; Yasuhiro Kodera; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Clinician-performed abdominal sonography.

Authors:  E Dickman; M O Tessaro; A C Arroyo; L E Haines; J P Marshall
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Decompression of the small bowel by endoscopic long-tube placement.

Authors:  Shi-Bin Guo; Zhi-Jun Duan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  New insertion method of transnasal ileus tube for small bowel obstruction: Anterior balloon method.

Authors:  Daisuke Yamaguchi; Kei Ikeda; Yuki Takeuchi; Rikako Kinoshita; Toru Higuchi; Hiroko Fukuda; Naoyuki Tominaga; Tomohito Morisaki; Keisuke Ario; Seiji Tsunada; Hisako Yoshida; Kazuma Fujimoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.