RATIONALE: Immunization of rats against nicotine using a nicotine conjugate vaccine reduces the distribution of nicotine to brain in rats and attenuates some of nicotine's physiological and behavioral effects. It is not known whether such a vaccine can attenuate nicotine's reinforcing effects. OBJECTIVE: The present experiment was conducted to determine whether a nicotine conjugate vaccine could interfere with the acquisition and maintenance of nicotine self-administration (NSA) in rats given 23 h day(-1) access to nicotine. METHODS: To examine acquisition of NSA, rats were vaccinated with nicotine or control immunogen prior to being given access to a 0.01 mg kg(-1) infusion(-1) nicotine under a fixed-ratio(FR) 1 schedule for week 1, FR 2 for week 2, and FR 3 for week 3. Acquisition of cocaine self-administration (CSA) was similarly examined to determine the specificity of vaccination effects. To examine maintenance of NSA, rats were initially trained to self-administer nicotine under an FR 3 schedule, and then vaccinated with nicotine or control immunogen while NSA continued to be monitored. RESULTS: NSA was significantly lower in vaccinated rats compared to controls during the acquisition protocol, with a 38% decrease in the number of infusions during the last week of training. The percentage of rats meeting acquisition criteria in the vaccinated group was lower (36%) than that in the control group (70%), but this difference was not statistically significant. Vaccination did not affect acquisition of CSA, demonstrating its specificity for nicotine. Maintenance of NSA was significantly reduced in vaccinated rats as compared to controls after the final vaccine injection, with a mean reduction of 57%. There was no evidence in either protocol that vaccinated rats attempted to compensate for altered nicotine distribution by increasing nicotine intake. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that vaccination against nicotine can reduce the reinforcing effects of nicotine in rats and may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of tobacco dependence.
RATIONALE: Immunization of rats against nicotine using a nicotine conjugate vaccine reduces the distribution of nicotine to brain in rats and attenuates some of nicotine's physiological and behavioral effects. It is not known whether such a vaccine can attenuate nicotine's reinforcing effects. OBJECTIVE: The present experiment was conducted to determine whether a nicotine conjugate vaccine could interfere with the acquisition and maintenance of nicotine self-administration (NSA) in rats given 23 h day(-1) access to nicotine. METHODS: To examine acquisition of NSA, rats were vaccinated with nicotine or control immunogen prior to being given access to a 0.01 mg kg(-1) infusion(-1) nicotine under a fixed-ratio(FR) 1 schedule for week 1, FR 2 for week 2, and FR 3 for week 3. Acquisition of cocaine self-administration (CSA) was similarly examined to determine the specificity of vaccination effects. To examine maintenance of NSA, rats were initially trained to self-administer nicotine under an FR 3 schedule, and then vaccinated with nicotine or control immunogen while NSA continued to be monitored. RESULTS: NSA was significantly lower in vaccinated rats compared to controls during the acquisition protocol, with a 38% decrease in the number of infusions during the last week of training. The percentage of rats meeting acquisition criteria in the vaccinated group was lower (36%) than that in the control group (70%), but this difference was not statistically significant. Vaccination did not affect acquisition of CSA, demonstrating its specificity for nicotine. Maintenance of NSA was significantly reduced in vaccinated rats as compared to controls after the final vaccine injection, with a mean reduction of 57%. There was no evidence in either protocol that vaccinated rats attempted to compensate for altered nicotine distribution by increasing nicotine intake. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that vaccination against nicotine can reduce the reinforcing effects of nicotine in rats and may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of tobacco dependence.
Authors: Mark G LeSage; Dan E Keyler; Don Shoeman; Donna Raphael; Gregory Collins; Paul R Pentel Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: D E McMillan; W C Hardwick; M Li; M G Gunnell; F I Carroll; P Abraham; S M Owens Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Sabina H L de Villiers; Katherine E Cornish; Andrew J Troska; Marco Pravetoni; Paul R Pentel Journal: Vaccine Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Katherine E Cornish; Andrew C Harris; Mark G LeSage; Dan E Keyler; Danielle Burroughs; Cathy Earley; Paul R Pentel Journal: Int Immunopharmacol Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 4.932
Authors: Michelle L Miller; Amira Y Moreno; Shawn M Aarde; Kevin M Creehan; Sophia A Vandewater; Brittani D Vaillancourt; M Jerry Wright; Kim D Janda; Michael A Taffe Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: M De Biasi; I McLaughlin; E E Perez; P A Crooks; L P Dwoskin; M T Bardo; P R Pentel; D Hatsukami Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Irina Esterlis; Jonas O Hannestad; Evgenia Perkins; Frederic Bois; D Cyril D'Souza; Rachel F Tyndale; John P Seibyl; Dorothy M Hatsukami; Kelly P Cosgrove; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 18.112