Literature DB >> 15990991

The potential value of blood biomarkers of intervertebral disk metabolism in the follow-up of patients with sciatica.

Federico Balagué1, Margareta Nordin, Dominique Schafer, Ali Sheikhzadeh, Mary Ellen Lenz, Eugene M A Thonar.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This is a prospective study with a follow-up period of 4 years.
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the possible clinical utility of three biomarkers [i.e., keratan sulfate (KS), hyaluronan, and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein] measured in peripheral blood in severe acute sciatica at intake and follow-up. SUMMARY OF
BACKGROUND: Our previous study and others have pointed out the interest of different laboratory tests in the acute phase of sciatica. Several blood biomarkers have been reported useful in the long-term follow-up of patients with osteoarthritis. We have found no information about the potential interest of these tests in spinal disorders.
METHODS: Patients were admitted to the hospital for intensive conservative management of acute sciatica (n=82). A subgroup of patients (n=33) was selected based on the duration of symptoms at visit 1, and included those with the shortest (n=24) as well as those with the longest (n=9) duration of sciatica. Blood samples were drawn, centrifuged, and the plasma frozen. Antigenic KS, hyaluronan, and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein were measured by ELISA. Patients were re-evaluated at an average of 4.3 years (range: 2.1-6.8 years).
RESULTS: Thirty-three subjects with an average age of 49.2+/-10.2 years participated. At intake, levels of the three biomarkers evaluated were within the range of normal values. No significant differences were found between the results of patients with a short history of sciatica (< or =3 weeks) and those with a long duration of symptoms (>20 weeks). At follow-up, a significant increase (P<0.05) in all three biomarkers was found.
CONCLUSIONS: A single measurement of these three biomarker molecules does not seem to have any diagnostic or therapeutic relevance in patients with acute radicular compression. The significance of the increase in all three biomarkers after a mean follow-up of 4.3 years is unclear; it might reflect metabolic processes involved in degenerative spinal disorders. Even though we found no correlation with clinical outcome, we believe that more research is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15990991      PMCID: PMC3489342          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0974-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  42 in total

1.  An analysis of 14 molecular markers for monitoring osteoarthritis: segregation of the markers into clusters and distinguishing osteoarthritis at baseline.

Authors:  I G Otterness; A C Swindell; R O Zimmerer; A R Poole; M Ionescu; E Weiner
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  What's in a name? The labelling of back pain.

Authors:  N Bogduk
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2000-10-16       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Computed tomographic follow-up study of forty-eight cases of nonoperatively treated lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Authors:  J Y Maigne; B Rime; B Deligne
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Changes with age in proteoglycan synthesis in cells cultured in vitro from the inner and outer rabbit annulus fibrosus. Responses to interleukin-1 and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein.

Authors:  S Maeda; S Kokubun
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Recovery of severe sciatica.

Authors:  F Balagué; M Nordin; A Sheikhzadeh; A C Echegoyen; H Brisby; H M Hoogewoud; P Fredman; M L Skovron
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A prospective study of serum pseudocholinesterase levels in patients with chronic spinal pain: a preliminary study.

Authors:  B M Cameron; R C Allen; C Merril
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein reflects osteoarthritis presence and severity: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project.

Authors:  A G Clark; J M Jordan; V Vilim; J B Renner; A D Dragomir; G Luta; V B Kraus
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1999-11

8.  Serum immunoglobulins in brain tumours and lumbar disc diseases.

Authors:  N Yüceer; E Arasil; C Temiz
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-02-07       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Early histologic changes in lower lumbar discs and facet joints and their correlation.

Authors:  N C Gries; U Berlemann; R J Moore; B Vernon-Roberts
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Articular cartilage and changes in arthritis. An introduction: cell biology of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L J Sandell; T Aigner
Journal:  Arthritis Res       Date:  2001-01-22
View more
  1 in total

1.  Do we need biomarkers for disc degeneration?

Authors:  Helen E Gruber; Edward N Hanley
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2007-02-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.