Robin M Queen1, Michael T Gross, Hsin-Yi Liu. 1. Michael W. Krzyzewski Human Performance Lab, 102 Finch Yeager Building, DUMC 3435, Duke University Durham, NC 27710, USA. robin.queen@duke.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of self-selected versus standardized running speeds on within-day and between-day repeatability of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics for running gait. METHODS: Subjects (six female, six male, age 18-35) were recreational athletes with no lower extremity injuries. The following study variables were analyzed using the coefficient of variation (CV): the peak angles for knee internal rotation, external rotation, varus, valgus, flexion, and extension; peak angles for ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion; peak impact force and propulsive force; and peak anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral ground reaction forces (GRFs). Data for the entire stance phase were analyzed using the coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) for the following variables: anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and vertical GRF; the angles and angular velocities for knee internal-external rotation, valgus-varus, flexion-extension, and ankle dorsiflexion-plantar flexion. Each variable was analyzed using a 2 x 2 (speed x day) repeated measures ANOVA (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: The within-day repeatability for all of the significantly different variables was greater than the between-day repeatability. For variables with a significant difference based on speed, the standardized running speed had greater repeatability. CONCLUSIONS: Within-day repeatability is generally greater than between-day repeatability. Running speed had little effect on the repeatability of any study variable. Having subjects run at a standardized speed may not be as important as previously thought.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of self-selected versus standardized running speeds on within-day and between-day repeatability of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics for running gait. METHODS: Subjects (six female, six male, age 18-35) were recreational athletes with no lower extremity injuries. The following study variables were analyzed using the coefficient of variation (CV): the peak angles for knee internal rotation, external rotation, varus, valgus, flexion, and extension; peak angles for ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion; peak impact force and propulsive force; and peak anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral ground reaction forces (GRFs). Data for the entire stance phase were analyzed using the coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) for the following variables: anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and vertical GRF; the angles and angular velocities for knee internal-external rotation, valgus-varus, flexion-extension, and ankle dorsiflexion-plantar flexion. Each variable was analyzed using a 2 x 2 (speed x day) repeated measures ANOVA (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: The within-day repeatability for all of the significantly different variables was greater than the between-day repeatability. For variables with a significant difference based on speed, the standardized running speed had greater repeatability. CONCLUSIONS: Within-day repeatability is generally greater than between-day repeatability. Running speed had little effect on the repeatability of any study variable. Having subjects run at a standardized speed may not be as important as previously thought.
Authors: David A Stone; John P Abt; Anthony J House; Jonathan S Akins; Jonathan J Pederson; Karen A Keenan; Scott M Lephart Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-04-07 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: K A Taylor; M E Terry; G M Utturkar; C E Spritzer; R M Queen; L A Irribarra; W E Garrett; L E DeFrate Journal: J Biomech Date: 2010-11-18 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Brian Noehren; Anne Schmitz; Ross Hempel; Carolyn Westlake; William Black Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Érica Q Silva; Andreia N Miana; Jane S S P Ferreira; Henry D Kiyomoto; Mauro C M E Dinato; Isabel C N Sacco Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Gregory D Myer; Nathaniel A Bates; Christopher A DiCesare; Kim D Barber Foss; Staci M Thomas; Samuel C Wordeman; Dai Sugimoto; Benjamin D Roewer; Jennifer M Medina McKeon; Stephanie L Di Stasi; Brian W Noehren; Michael McNally; Kevin R Ford; Adam W Kiefer; Timothy E Hewett Journal: J Sport Rehabil Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Diego Protasio de Vasconcelos; Felipe J Aidar; Tarcisio Brandao Lima; Flavio Martins do Nascimento Filho; Igor Leonardo Alves Mendonça; Alfonso López Díaz-de-Durana; Nuno Domingos Garrido; Michael Silveira Santiago; Walderi Monteiro da Silva Junior Journal: Clin Pract Date: 2022-06-10