Literature DB >> 15988326

Benefit of slow infusion of hypertonic saline/dextran in swine with uncontrolled aortotomy hemorrhage.

Stephen P Bruttig1, John D O'Benar, Charles E Wade, Michael A Dubick.   

Abstract

In laboratory models of uncontrolled hemorrhage, immediate resuscitation from hemorrhage is associated with high mortality. However, in clinical practice, resuscitation is often delayed and the rate of fluid administration is limited. We hypothesized that a slow rate of infusion after delayed resuscitation, reflecting the clinical environment, might improve survival in the presence of uncontrolled hemorrhage. To investigate the rate of administration in the presence of delayed resuscitation, we subjected anesthetized swine weighing 35 to 45 kg to wire suture abdominal aortotomy that resulted in an uncontrolled hemorrhage. After a 30-min delay, hemorrhaged swine were infused i.v. with 4 mL/kg hypertonic saline/Dextran solution (7.5% saline in 6% Dextran 70) administered as a bolus over 1 min or as a slow infusion over 12 min (the time period to administer a similar volume to a human with a gravity feed i.v. and an 18-gauge needle) and were then monitored for another 90 min. Survival increased to 78% (seven of nine) in the slow infusion group compared with a survival rate of 56% (five of nine) in the bolus group and 50% (7/14) in the untreated controls. Blood loss was significantly higher in the bolus group (926 +/- 77 mL) compared with the slow infusion (714 +/- 83 mL) and control groups (604 +/- 46 mL). Hypertonic saline/Dextran administered slowly significantly increased cardiac output and blood pressure. Taken together, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that resuscitation solutions can be effective for treatment of uncontrolled hemorrhage when administered at a slow infusion rate 30 min after the insult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15988326     DOI: 10.1097/01.shk.0000168872.37660.d2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  6 in total

Review 1.  Damage Control Resuscitation.

Authors:  Jason M Samuels; Hunter B Moore; Ernest E Moore
Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)       Date:  2017 Sept-Oct

2.  Out-of-hospital hypertonic resuscitation after traumatic hypovolemic shock: a randomized, placebo controlled trial.

Authors:  Eileen M Bulger; Susanne May; Jeffery D Kerby; Scott Emerson; Ian G Stiell; Martin A Schreiber; Karen J Brasel; Samuel A Tisherman; Raul Coimbra; Sandro Rizoli; Joseph P Minei; J Steven Hata; George Sopko; David C Evans; David B Hoyt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Efficacy of a topical bovine-derived thrombin solution as a hemostatic agent in a rodent model of hepatic injury.

Authors:  Desiree D Rosselli; Benjamin M Brainard; Chad W Schmiedt
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Fluid resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhage using a hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier: effect of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Nathan J White; Xu Wang; Nicole Bradbury; Paula F Moon-Massat; Daniel Freilich; Charles Auker; Richard McCarron; Anke Scultetus; Susan A Stern
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 5.  Seven Mathematical Models of Hemorrhagic Shock.

Authors:  Luciano Curcio; Laura D'Orsi; Andrea De Gaetano
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 6.  ROC trials update on prehospital hypertonic saline resuscitation in the aftermath of the US-Canadian trials.

Authors:  Michael A Dubick; Pang Shek; Charles E Wade
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.365

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.