Literature DB >> 15988266

Defining vascular supply and territory of thinned perforator flaps: part I. Anterolateral thigh perforator flap.

Kimihiro Nojima1, Spencer A Brown, Cengiz Acikel, Gary Arbique, Serdar Ozturk, James Chao, Kunihiro Kurihara, Rod J Rohrich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The anterolateral thigh perforator flap is increasingly being used for trauma and reconstructive surgical cases. With the thinned flap design, greater survivability and a decrease in donor-site morbidity are observed. To increase our knowledge of the vascular territories in these flaps, an anatomic study was performed to determine pedicle number, location, and diameter; accompanying veins; vascular territory; and where surgical incisions can be made safely during thinning, as opposed to the "danger zone."
METHODS: Thirteen anterolateral thigh perforator flaps were harvested from seven adult cadavers. The largest perforator arteries were cannulated, and flaps were thinned to a thickness of 6 to 8 mm, with a 2.5-cm radius from the perforator retained. Vascular territories were quantified before and after thinning by nonradiographic and radiographic methods. A series of dyes were injected: red dye for skin (photography) followed by Omnipaque for the whole flap (radiography) before thinning, and blue dye for skin (photography) and lead oxide for the whole flap (radiography) after thinning. Pedicle locations were determined by ratios of anatomical landmarks. Danger zone measurements were derived at specific thicknesses using lateral radiographs of each flap.
RESULTS: In anterolateral thigh perforator flaps, the mean perforator artery diameter at the fascia level was 1.00 +/- 0.08 mm (range, 0.84 to 1.11 mm) and the mean number of perforator arteries was 1.69 +/- 1.03 (+/-SD). Perforator pedicles were located near the midpoint of the line between the anterior superior iliac spine and the lateral aspect of the patella in the vertical axis. The mean vascular territories were 256 +/- 52.5 cm2 (photography) and 351 +/- 72.8 cm2 (radiography) in unthinned flaps and 211 +/- 65.7 cm2 (photography) and 289 +/- 106.6 cm2 (radiography) in thinned flaps. Differences in overall vascular territories after thinning were 83.3 percent (photography) and 81.8 percent (radiography) compared with unthinned flaps. Four respective vascular territory maps were drawn showing surgical territories using percentile confidence intervals (98th and 90th) and averages. From the skin at thicknesses of 4, 6, and 8 mm, the 98th percentile danger zones were 33 to 37 mm (proximal to distal), 30 to 35 mm, and 27 to 31 mm from the pedicle in the vertical axis, respectively; in the horizontal axis, they were 30 to 34 mm (medial to lateral), 28 to 31 mm, and 25 to 29 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: These data define anterolateral thigh perforator flap pedicle location, number, and diameter before harvesting, surgical danger zones during thinning, and vascular territories after thinning. The authors' guidelines provide surgeons with anatomical vascular territory maps to design and harvest specific flaps for optimal results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15988266     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000170801.78135.00

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  11 in total

1.  [Defect coverage with myofasciocutaneous free flaps. Consequence of corticosteroid infiltration of the wrist in a patient on immunosuppressive therapy].

Authors:  M R Konieczny; E J Müller; A Gaggl; K-H Bürger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  The Superficial Femoral Artery Flap: A 3-Dimensional Anatomical Study.

Authors:  Hadal El-Hadi; Steven Morris; Ali Alkhawaji
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of the head and neck: radial forearm flap or anterolateral thigh flap?

Authors:  Wei-Wei Liu; Hao Li; Zhu-Ming Guo; Quan Zhang; An-Kui Yang; Xue-Kui Liu; Ming Song
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Versatility of Free Cutaneous Flaps for Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Reconstruction.

Authors:  Howard D Wang; Jose C Alonso-Escalante; Brian H Cho; Ramon A DeJesus
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2017-06-27

5.  Near-infrared laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging for optimizing the design of the anterolateral thigh flap.

Authors:  Justin M Sacks; Alexander T Nguyen; Justin M Broyles; Peirong Yu; Ian L Valerio; Donald P Baumann
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-07-05

6.  Aesthetic and functional outcomes of the innervated and thinned anterolateral thigh flap in reconstruction of upper limb defects.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Torres-Ortíz Zermeño; Javier López Mendoza
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2014-11-16

7.  Practical considerations for perforator flap thinning procedures revisited.

Authors:  Theddeus Oh Prasetyono; Kristaninta Bangun; Frank B Buchari; Putri Rezkini
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11-03

8.  Fascial Free Flap for Reconstruction of the Dorsolateral Hand and Digits: The Advantage of a Thin Contour.

Authors:  Min Gue Lee; Jin Soo Kim; Dong Chul Lee; Si Young Roh; Kyung Jin Lee; Byeong Kyoo Choi
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2016-11-18

9.  Combined Use of an Anterolateral Thigh Flap and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap for Reconstruction of an Extensive Abdominal Wall Defect.

Authors:  Shimpei Miyamoto; Yu Kagaya; Masaki Arikawa; Eisuke Kobayashi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-11-28

10.  Tensor fascia latae perforator flap: An alternative reconstructive choice for anterolateral thigh flap when no sizable skin perforator is available.

Authors:  Federico Contedini; Luca Negosanti; Valentina Pinto; Beatrice Tavaniello; Erich Fabbri; Rossella Sgarzani; Daniela Tassone; Riccardo Cipriani
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.