Literature DB >> 15986741

Taylored implants for alloplastic cranioplasty--clinical and surgical considerations.

B Hoffmann1, A Sepehrnia.   

Abstract

Traumatic loss of bone substance or post - decompression defects require the reconstruction of the skull. In cases of simple geometry there are handy, secure and cost effective procedures such as using autologuous cryopreserved bone flaps or polymerized Methylmethacrylat. For large sized defects CAD - taylored implants developed to provide a comfortable procedure to ensure high biocompatibility and perfect anatomical results by one - stage surgery. Furthermore cranioplasty does not only imply anatomical reconstruction but also functional recovery of awareness, cognition and motoric functions as shown in several studies according to changes in cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism. In our series of 286 patients who underwent cranioplasty during the past 10 years (1993-2003) we used taylored implants in 15 cases starting in 1999. All the patients included showed large sized defects > 64 cm2, complications did not occur neither during surgery nor the postoperative course, cosmetical results were excellent in all the patients. Neurological findings and the functional state improved in 11/15 patients, 4/15 patients showed no change, nevertheless these patients had reached a good recovery before surgery. Application of this technique is limited by cost, nonetheless it is recommended for extensive reconstruction of the skull.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15986741     DOI: 10.1007/3-211-27577-0_21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl        ISSN: 0065-1419


  7 in total

1.  Customized cranioplasty implants using three-dimensional printers and polymethyl-methacrylate casting.

Authors:  Bum-Joon Kim; Ki-Sun Hong; Kyung-Jae Park; Dong-Hyuk Park; Yong-Gu Chung; Shin-Hyuk Kang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-12-31

2.  Surgical treatment of frontal sinus fracture sequelae with methyl methacrylate prosthesis.

Authors:  Lucas Cavalieri-Pereira; Adriano Assis; Sergio Olate; Luciana Asprino; Marcio de Moraes
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2013-11-01

Review 3.  A review on computer-aided design and manufacturing of patient-specific maxillofacial implants.

Authors:  Afaque Rafique Memon; Enpeng Wang; Junlei Hu; Jan Egger; Xiaojun Chen
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Cranioplasty prosthesis manufacturing based on reverse engineering technology.

Authors:  Robert Chrzan; Andrzej Urbanik; Krzysztof Karbowski; Marek Moskała; Jarosław Polak; Marek Pyrich
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-01

5.  Prefabricated patient-matched cranial implants for reconstruction of large skull defects.

Authors:  Jarle Sundseth; Jon Berg-Johnsen
Journal:  J Cent Nerv Syst Dis       Date:  2013-02-20

6.  Computer-aided implant design for the restoration of cranial defects.

Authors:  Xiaojun Chen; Lu Xu; Xing Li; Jan Egger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Cranioplasty with autologous cryopreserved bone after decompressive craniectomy: complications and risk factors for developing surgical site infection.

Authors:  J Sundseth; A Sundseth; J Berg-Johnsen; W Sorteberg; K-F Lindegaard
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.216

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.