Literature DB >> 15986401

Improving the quality of life of patients with prostate carcinoma: a randomized trial testing the efficacy of a nurse-driven intervention.

R Brian Giesler1, Barbara Given, Charles W Given, Susan Rawl, Patrick Monahan, Debra Burns, Faouzi Azzouz, Kristina M Reuille, Sally Weinrich, Michael Koch, Victoria Champion.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatments for clinically localized prostate carcinoma are accompanied by sexual, urinary, and bowel dysfunction and other sequelae that can result in significant distress and reduced well being. Methods capable of improving quality of life are needed that can be integrated into clinical practice. To address this need, a nurse-driven, cancer care intervention was developed and tested.
METHODS: Within 6 weeks after completing treatment, 99 patients, along with their partners, were enrolled into a prospective, controlled trial and were randomized to receive the cancer care intervention or to receive standard care. Participants in the intervention arm met once each month for 6 months with an oncology nurse intervenor, who helped patients identify their quality-of-life needs using an interactive computer program. The intervener then provided education and support tailored to participants' needs. Primary outcome variables included 1) disease-specific quality of life, including sexual, urinary, and bowel outcomes and cancer worry; 2) depression; 3) dyadic adjustment; and 4) general quality of life. Outcomes data were collected prior to randomization and again at 4 months, 7 months, and 12 months posttreatment.
RESULTS: Patients in the intervention arm experienced long-term improvements in quality-of-life outcomes related to sexual functioning and cancer worry compared with patients who received standard care. Baseline depression moderated the impact of the intervention on several other quality-of-life outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study indicated that a computer-assisted, nurse-driven intervention was capable of providing durable improvements in the quality of life of men who underwent treatment for clinically localized prostate carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15986401     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  39 in total

1.  A randomized trial of internet-based versus traditional sexual counseling for couples after localized prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Leslie R Schover; Andrea L Canada; Ying Yuan; Dawen Sui; Leah Neese; Rosell Jenkins; Michelle M Rhodes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Symptom management strategies for men with early-stage prostate cancer: results from the Prostate Cancer Patient Education Program (PC PEP).

Authors:  Alok Vij; Marc A Kowalkowski; Tae Hart; Heather Honoré Goltz; David J Hoffman; Sara J Knight; Peter R Caroll; David M Latini
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Effectiveness of family and caregiver interventions on patient outcomes in adults with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joan M Griffin; Laura A Meis; Roderick MacDonald; Nancy Greer; Agnes Jensen; Indulis Rutks; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  A review and recommendations for optimal outcome measures of anxiety, depression and general distress in studies evaluating psychosocial interventions for English-speaking adults with heterogeneous cancer diagnoses.

Authors:  Tim Luckett; Phyllis N Butow; Madeleine T King; Mayumi Oguchi; Gaynor Heading; Nadine A Hackl; Nicole Rankin; Melanie A Price
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of couple-based intervention on sexuality and the quality of life of cancer patients and their partners.

Authors:  Minjie Li; Carmen W H Chan; Ka Ming Chow; Jinnan Xiao; Kai Chow Choi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  The Prostate Cancer Rehabilitation Clinic: a biopsychosocial clinic for sexual dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  A Matthew; N Lutzky-Cohen; L Jamnicky; K Currie; A Gentile; D Santa Mina; N Fleshner; A Finelli; R Hamilton; G Kulkarni; M Jewett; A Zlotta; J Trachtenberg; Z Yang; D Elterman
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer.

Authors:  Hoda Badr; Paul Krebs
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Sociocultural determinants of men's reactions to prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Glenda Wrenn; Benita Weathers; Ernestine Delmoor; Thomas Ten Have; James C Coyne
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 9.  Cancer survivorship: challenges and changing paradigms.

Authors:  Scott M Gilbert; David C Miller; Brent K Hollenbeck; James E Montie; John T Wei
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Early decision and psychosocial support intervention for men with localised prostate cancer: an integrated approach.

Authors:  Suzanne K Steginga; Megan Ferguson; Samantha Clutton; R A Frank Gardiner; David Nicol
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.