Literature DB >> 15986110

A case for informed consent? Indoor UV tanning facility operator's provision of health risks information (United States).

Lauren F Heilig1, Renee D'Ambrosia, Amanda L Drake, Robert P Dellavalle, Eric J Hester.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Indoor UV tanning is associated with skin cancer. This study describes consumer health risks information provided by indoor UV tanning facility operators in four states (Colorado, Illinois, Texas, and Wisconsin) with varying operator training, regulations, enforcement and penalties.
METHODS: Using a cross-sectional survey study design, 100 randomly selected licensed indoor UV tanning facilities from each state were surveyed anonymously by telephone. Facility operators were questioned regarding the provision of information on potential adverse effects of indoor UV exposure.
RESULTS: Of 628 licensed indoor UV tanning facilities contacted, 400 facilities were surveyed. Most (87%) advised patrons of the potential risk of sunburn from indoor tanning. Less than half of facility operators in Colorado, Texas and Wisconsin informed patrons about the risk of skin cancer (42, 43 and 48%, respectively) compared with 81% of Illinois operators. Likewise, more operators in Illinois reported the risk of premature aging (79%) compared with other states (41% Colorado, 43% Texas and 51% Wisconsin).
CONCLUSIONS: Tanning facility operators frequently misinformed patrons of indoor UV exposure risks. The provision of informed consent by indoor tanning facility operators needs improved adaptation by the tanning industry as a standard for customer service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15986110     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-004-6572-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  7 in total

1.  Geography, facilities, and promotional strategies used to encourage indoor tanning in New York City.

Authors:  Corey H Brouse; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Charles E Basch; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-08

2.  Practices of unregulated tanning facilities in Missouri: implications for statewide legislation.

Authors:  Brundha Balaraman; Lauren K Biesbroeck; Stephanie H Lickerman; Lynn A Cornelius; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Recall of indoor tanning salon warnings and safety guidelines among a national sample of tanners.

Authors:  Ashley K Day; Elliot J Coups; Sharon L Manne; Jerod L Stapleton
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Contextual factors, indoor tanning, and tanning dependence in young women.

Authors:  Carolyn J Heckman; Susan D Darlow; Jacqueline D Kloss; Teja Munshi; Sharon L Manne
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2015-05

5.  Warning signs observed in tanning salons in New York City: implications for skin cancer prevention.

Authors:  Corey H Brouse; Charles E Basch; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Engaging Moms on Teen Indoor Tanning Through Social Media: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sherry L Pagoto; Katie Baker; Julia Griffith; Jessica L Oleski; Ashley Palumbo; Barbara J Walkosz; Joel Hillhouse; Kimberly L Henry; David B Buller
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-11-29

Review 7.  A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation.

Authors:  Jessica Reimann; Jennifer E McWhirter; Andrew Papadopoulos; Cate Dewey
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.